IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Big TP codespace

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 15 May 2019 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6607712009E for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id loWfHi5FC6Ee for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D5C612004C for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id m20so879071lji.2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WJednx4Sm9gthKlzlNHOEkdmyiMbPwvA7eEDigmGsVo=; b=mbmMwb6jH6ya1xJ8v3sOMIgBg+qMrP48uTr+P97et4pMTLnmHJX59kPI2sIsImT3g3 iUQsroGzFaVhrwTI+TLb2J5EFhJY/M9IH++LH+p3w7hQmaKYpRc18WB7l6vJY/N+7pSg +0sXBFt0Q583ATX7qKozVYyKss22ccHmO5q3H7Sr20xXAvdfanjZRJjCschPeSzT1hoX +nqgh20I3s6w1ilSGrtukYk9VcY6AKzMEcNTf2hz0vV/mcV+WTZFJvmNASFBqLcExIe7 wvdxx3zq+8ZvzfWpzn0/qofSdgUdn+vKOVMLBfQuMsjgF9xcDlq53qmendi2m2wF/ECp 9WSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WJednx4Sm9gthKlzlNHOEkdmyiMbPwvA7eEDigmGsVo=; b=Invsl5fa4K42UHgd/z3LUkpc8JfDr8pyG9uB8BeoTGl9fWFACNfOywk572xg3obpml xYBzwUa9Eh+VZEaXZM4Hq4loFzmePLZraOY3ER2fnbuNynYK+iDXGRhJ4poSPI227NPX vjTHe7pw/0RKnL8YlA0M+gqOluLmM91bd71SZ88YoxWry3cE4doItUqtk0cZmvmznR4/ ZRzfd8IP+QPB9DbHZ9Ec38p7TPYAU1ohTT3yR32ez193PjTfcMCr7tIGkp1Oo0CmcZVp dSSLdP58CgCpRkwYzeaJU623uCtHZoTcvx4WieYCSehTJPTxamurHTSsMyJFYWS4s4Jc xuWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUdZM/Nj96FEDxuRMJlbrvS+7hLicK/dAW3O8D22Ax+TpFEhmG jjV9KVzogTol32iMMOiDJsod6ITEfAsQrY+Tzj9Bcw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxqweHy4KugpNe8rD/ahnouLzAiRFba7ykM3hoRq0oOlKMAeQhfVCTge1g9LITIQSMglsH4Njsd7cZCZvbbCcg=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:860a:: with SMTP id a10mr9370051lji.158.1557879708334; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4esxRBmm8CVWWeg=Fq6=JzS0ftQsj=0T6CfhQ8KHmkUNpenQ@mail.gmail.com> <C91C33EC-323B-41AB-8856-9FE56A065CF3@huitema.net> <CAPDSy+4KiCaG_ap_R=qcSm9wYA8ZU94983d5YWV3AZ9Vz=WHMQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+4KiCaG_ap_R=qcSm9wYA8ZU94983d5YWV3AZ9Vz=WHMQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 17:21:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPpLh9ejrg-VbYKyL5rYV2=Y533SrqA+A_-jM4R-sGZ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Big TP codespace
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009e55870588e22268"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/2aVdJmZBAL5irgIQq-ytx480l18>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 00:21:52 -0000

What's the bigger principle you are endorsing? What errors "like this" are
we not requiring detection of?

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 5:19 PM David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Our implementation checks for duplicates only for the transport parameters
> it supports. I think #2691
> <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2691/files> is the correct
> solution.
>
> +1 to the design principle of encouraging but not requiring detection of
> errors like this
>
> David
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:06 PM Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net
> <huitema@huitema..net>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On May 13, 2019, at 1:58 PM, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > What do people think?
>>
>> I think the general rule of protocol policing should be "MUST NOT" do
>> dastardly stuff, and "MAY" drop the connection when that happens.
>>
>> -- Christian Huitema
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email