IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Who wants -10 drafts?

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Wed, 21 February 2018 03:06 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007A9127869 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:06:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m7CFZ_3HhQMF for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com (mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com [138.201.61.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE61124D68 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xsmtp12.mail2web.com ([168.144.250.177]) by mx44.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1eoKk8-0003KR-Qv for quic@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:06:53 +0100
Received: from [10.5.2.12] (helo=xmail02.myhosting.com) by xsmtp12.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1eoKk5-00006q-AD for quic@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:06:51 -0500
Received: (qmail 26975 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2018 03:06:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.101]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.56.42.184]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail02.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <quic@ietf.org>; 21 Feb 2018 03:06:47 -0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com>
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
References: <CABkgnnVWdRYDKUwgrfTjRmb9q_M9bAiysVYy-zDicGLrEGcvng@mail.gmail.com> <4A74CD08-00C9-451A-80E8-E6AD7F644DED@apple.com> <CABkgnnUBZdexEaxbnXb+L1U-b0mMZ9MH91ZnDduGqT97vcF+Yw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Message-ID: <09090022-d773-bde5-afe8-48535f02693a@huitema.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 19:06:41 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUBZdexEaxbnXb+L1U-b0mMZ9MH91ZnDduGqT97vcF+Yw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------60EC88D1D0ADA80CC31F00EE"
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: Who wants -10 drafts?
X-Originating-IP: 168.144.250.177
X-AntiSpamCloud-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-AntiSpamCloud-Username: 168.144.250.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=168.144.250.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.48)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5jK+IXDo0c4ZbkkE6FnxHh9602E9L7XzfQH6nu9C/Fh9KJzpNe6xgvOx q3u0UDjvO37pNwwF1lRXh5rzvPzo9Jts1ujulqUFmMITHM77eiViqLqRkFGUaeeRMHRkTZb1zc7i TvJ2/ZGzVWB9scFAaCdIFaUvXN+CI+RGy3Me16pB+FWCyy3VMwU/Tu6lpkyLYh/TBCf6oYXAWGet lavcAjD9ytQxIHf9lN5jjLJaPK8lRJSPf/SXbEnDSsal/zZzc4n9VZdr7RAFD5mRwooUYhwMPaBP aKeQW+/QlaOdv8isl/qMm08Zpim2AHUKEWvQ6G/bWfgucjnNmABpGhD9TTttrFCuZ0NkwnSz2Luu o1u9uevuNfM1HjkNEFwape+IgNezYqxGMqsKjARq8PBC4qjSYb8Ll5Ew7esaVIVXxqL4mdySlZou 9qHIGOZDEEo7Oyc1nq0gsY582CWqKjiRB3upW940lL8kAcN44/h+EKQYZsb471zK7fbW8hSVMoqp pS0tFl0bR3sce73Q9OxrVmW8qt58sjfcrtp3jANJdxJ17LOKnTajLBlbnpYTTzDXX9m1LR/Rkhms gi1bNni1Nx10xK5dOvm4pbg8CBiJcsFLIaKLZaIWHErhz1UEr981hLCx4eCSemGsHMs75OfoLqcm 7I3bwInONPnB4uC7QfcgpyI1J519bLUrM3neslGWzosDwfIvvMsVZUpPp4sK3qDouROe77KOt1v8 CMoiiVQVf/qOH8le3Zo2iD646pXyZ+L6wWgmpZk5jRsdv2uoK5oKcZIuviiTlhP5iKsKcxHRbTmK Jq2ms5fD0VtmD1NhTzoUd/Fji/4E0A1Wfl7CNnoniG/Mx18wh299NVDnPvmw8t3Xj/LzZ5s/OJg1 L2asZ1FPmtYUPwECbZov76lmox9FrrkXXOH9yk2+X2eiUHXZfks5suSVIgIg9uJ3gfzn7g==
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine5.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/FFvPnvouUflZAGSvKZ0hNhUNfpY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 03:06:57 -0000

On 2/20/2018 6:08 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@apple.com> wrote:
>> For the purposes of the interop, I believe we were still doing HTTP 0.9.  Has that changed?
> Yes, interop is QUIC -09 and HTTP 0.9 (no relation).
>
>> I’m not sure how many people will take advantage of hq-10 interop but I don’t see any harm in publishing -10 drafts.
> I might, but whether that is possible will depend on a great many
> things.  Nor do I think my own implementation matters much in
> determining this.

I understand that at some point we must start moving up the stack and
test the HTTP mappings. I am not anywhere close to ready with that,
because I am not starting with an HTTP 2 implementation. If it is what
is takes to test the transport, I will do one, or port one. But no way I
can do that in the next 8 days.

-- Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email