Re: Call for Adoption: QCRAM

Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com> Mon, 05 February 2018 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jri@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D13F12D95C for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 12:01:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vn9WrwW2yV7W for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 12:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x235.google.com (mail-yw0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E3112D953 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 12:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x235.google.com with SMTP id u17so19264194ywg.9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:01:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uHhjPUDLBFETKUMoRYh+jLGSx3gOvlAVa/6hrfOLMh4=; b=rFHsHSZnz9Mv6X9EnKp36sGRI5HHtv08jBBbrKXtUQJNdOsQ1P3y7Ywr9/6t8ZNk9u 9RYCxmrodmT0bzdORlJBIvBHWJ9ReueefdGr4qffBHLINNPSbHf6tIAaVd3YWDci4aC/ LPq0lynuoHNN2JI4m7RYRcOeC4bfSV4RZM65afGlTfMi0xwgsn8T4Xm8m1j7gFLOHQkT 7cIXhdZpgDxvFGmzb/wCzWp8awmtprqGBxigNXCoO+5B1HoXCSZKqzsmbWBjnyIZfUTC W626mHbLXIjXwjIa1BeWEBZollyOcn46KSmNb1+b7t7EIC5GAmBJOtN+AHzq+IKoGxtt rAwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uHhjPUDLBFETKUMoRYh+jLGSx3gOvlAVa/6hrfOLMh4=; b=dLRxNNBkMZbTvb8R6t5/VXbIGOYKriqLpyGcYJdw3Gn6333KyPTylRVFvENOpgHNV0 zN9aXRSFgNbLtW01kBWf/JDAuUduy7rFeymSN9Dimi3syYh+YTLGgHoB/mI1mKo4vxRv SiShzlK/ybbf3nYGozvw+neMzaP8c2mSEDN2nsAWysa0eODjfxeywE9IJCYYc2+B/Q4D b92o7IhcvpSO3pIOb5axMz4k+P6y9/S1cPnNOCzkY/hVfXIujPuzUTIRpWXawgBMlGeG lx+J8FCDgNrNZrdwY1NNrpHsrVuMX9QRGmit5UvUqi08jmcA7za0wmUr9n9Bz494rpKD Tdsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytePKQxlXRinTPdxZtlARTyZs6ORgHxcYzV8AYPMoBmstB+O2qiu 7qwuaY9GJ0WkbdUwo01zvnNd54qCo9/CEdjMQ2upKg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224AGrZzkn0oo3eUE57lTNa9uK48oHoCJpRvWeT2RJPl0eRjhMQXpxEkUqKUaIyHNl7zwc//XLj+3eBdvTUSrRI=
X-Received: by 10.129.60.9 with SMTP id j9mr31781612ywa.315.1517860872566; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:01:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.135.77 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 12:01:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AA758D7F-9A4F-4500-88D9-5E58B5FCFCCC@fb.com>
References: <6A834DB6-F2A5-4973-83CD-8AAA82945372@mnot.net> <MWHPR08MB2432D84D112FFD948497DF7FDAFE0@MWHPR08MB2432.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <AA758D7F-9A4F-4500-88D9-5E58B5FCFCCC@fb.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:01:11 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGD1bZZtTQF++ShtQqvL7YSptu8b9vkHaDnx7dcnjy+2LeDXcw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: QCRAM
To: Roberto Peon <fenix@fb.com>
Cc: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142e95c21c6f005647c861e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/J003SpirywRdGapQBf-Vpx0TTnw>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 20:01:31 -0000

+1 for adoption.

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Roberto Peon <fenix@fb.com> wrote:

> Agreed.
> Supported.
> -=R
>
> On 2/5/18, 11:04 AM, "QUIC on behalf of Mike Bishop" <
> quic-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of mbishop@evequefou.be> wrote:
>
>     I support adoption -- it's a useful starting point from which we can
> discuss what elements of other proposals are worth lifting into this model.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: QUIC [mailto:quic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nottingham
>     Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2018 10:08 PM
>     To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
>     Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
>     Subject: Call for Adoption: QCRAM
>
>     In Melbourne, there was strong support (with a small amount of
> pushback which was discussed) for adopting QCRAM:
>
>     https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.
> ietf.org_html_draft-2Dkrasic-2Dquic-2Dqcram-2D04&d=DwIFAg&
> c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=C0sUo-LFNBaYfyoaCsf6TA&m=
> 9CL2DzRCrvpWRESeqQzeBJWmA5Csgju_t_mAM9Tkrv8&s=YUt-etfRURzJAU3Kk3Mh-
> 63Xsk6Eqt6jt3_NmshNro0&e=
>
>     Any objections / concerns about doing so? Unless we hear otherwise,
> we'll adopt at the end of the week.
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     --
>     Mark Nottingham   https://urldefense.proofpoint.
> com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.mnot.net_&d=DwIFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=
> C0sUo-LFNBaYfyoaCsf6TA&m=9CL2DzRCrvpWRESeqQzeBJWmA5Csgju_t_mAM9Tkrv8&s=
> 9sx1bBh6dd4D4LmaSoWRjQ6mlZzlU_NePbl0kmvnXHE&e=
>
>
>
>