Re: QUIC paper at ACM IMC

Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com> Mon, 11 December 2017 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jri@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B191127369 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:58:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T02NTYvHXWhn for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:58:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22d.google.com (mail-yb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8DC6124D68 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:57:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id z11so1745354ybm.1 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:57:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gpiv4+C6PmhX7besRLkKFFjr5B2PKz8PHCugWO9MZtA=; b=CIL4akvudDBTn7fZps8GSR+VUqrdhJNuAofB1OGeawScXx2IR+xztVpVYMQ1adzgaE XvFMV5nZAjuAwob+2pd7H6xbRMiUtkUZWciMkZsqPS4l/RHspugn5EGS+N6G/eflL6tN tWANYcnCMb5uAOFKCS9Ky0mqUzfEEp9P5hEOZSAXQ3ml+9yopn+r+fEk04PgTPWndulW oDxApQFiIrS1mXUolyilZ3Ht/g9J1IvZWGu58nAoRnkXs3sgp+7K2CH0y8mLi5tkBYnq LxsWXFc8wC4YkGZwh58bZUMD3vIjTofNbJud2SBB7cxlD4HfvB2Jm0DNdXOtaTw25whX UPeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gpiv4+C6PmhX7besRLkKFFjr5B2PKz8PHCugWO9MZtA=; b=OWYF9/Gck4rBqjgKbdHsyep/+BeRzbNkr9TsQVt41lMY9+tFZodK+UXvq74Rgr6dxt 6OpS2MZWWezTGElqK8+Z4cDSQDiTTvTldXXNtaTuZCYxXxEnN02NSlF7K9p4PgifTU0P QVhzU81EAhHR3AMZI02GmpS8Isvw1MuV9Vvb85Xa/2lHw187DEckV9F3X9M2Hxtzmtfv CP3wMWspaBrT8U9s2QWW479TpnEphOcXTVyrissKrBRpap4ZvjNu7/FbR3eVZh92iA2B dD9X/OXE3SEYk3Ha5Ud01esMtVU1ZQCKU8TxQksFUXOrLPOhlH0pzqsy5uX7rOJn3exf GBHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mItTUNkfRz45MrH2u2Eop09d6ac0BjDQjAKvrg7yoRNq+sk5bOA Lq8Z7B0Qve6X/vUO1OLs1nw3GmrgUlFy2+QawaHQ0Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBostxwybeKpiRi83KuxctXgdBY8DRrDE1QUU/Dm9NmQOhTV++MrDLsKplrPzvB4em166uE1cj38Hj57yYMF8IPY=
X-Received: by 10.37.144.14 with SMTP id s14mr1172992ybl.323.1513022278549; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:57:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.42.78 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:57:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9F467123-CC23-4BB1-B784-0DB7B72ECBD7@netapp.com>
References: <9F467123-CC23-4BB1-B784-0DB7B72ECBD7@netapp.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:57:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGD1bZZ2sLkufNqCxxaMBWebLD8fuwCvav2YFG2XARyGSAKLOw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: QUIC paper at ACM IMC
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082c7820742cdb056015f374"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/QktVML_qNDfqjIGirj4t5D0JRGE>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:58:02 -0000

Yup, thanks for sharing -- I've read earlier versions of this paper. The
results mostly agree with what we've seen and published with GQUIC
performance IIRC, but it's a good piece of reproducible work (as against
our work which was basically numbers out of Google). It's a good read.


On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com>; wrote:

> Hi,
>
> in case folks hadn't seen it, there was a QUIC paper presented at this
> year's ACM IMC conference:
>
> Taking a Long Look at QUIC: An Approach for Rigorous Evaluation of Rapidly
> Evolving Transport Protocols. Arash Molavi Kakhki (Northeastern
> University), Samuel Jero (Purdue University), David Choffnes, Alan Mislove,
> and Cristina Nita-Rotaru (Northeastern University)
>
> Go to https://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2017/program/ and search for
> "QUIC", paper and slides are online.
>
> Lars
>