IETF Logo Mail Archive

Is CONNECTION_CLOSE frame Ack-eliciting？

Jiuhai Zhang <jiuhai.zhang@gmail.com> Wed, 05 June 2019 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jiuhai.zhang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CA71200B7 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 05:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IkUJ_shwN0uW for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 05:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18D6F120020 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 05:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id l26so18852299lfh.13 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 05:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ttlZTGy8mNn2nkmIeja+cSogvVMkl387iKJ49bhXk40=; b=fTLav+8HzEK8kHEpjI/15PDa5uJn+OtJB3Rux/wPovB9934Bt0HsyxyfwTrAt/mpgZ gxAxYlMG4bo8wBiX3nflMsdbBzLdD7nzcJ2oNk3ajQt0a2VMr4LjmfsioWIq0hnD7aI3 ydU7rd9DIX+O1L8I4jFIg/wTGSzd/JWjuEVGjsCZDSYsLyAl93IuIuko7ZweSM63fggk UpVfk9MYcPotxdLB0tQzGvh2wtQcFC0xa1cAvQkPLMAwn+LdrXvNAUYeji1cDH9pl6Db liYfmthVNiaaCL0vKyIywTc2BCIiVVN6NhiY+wvVmNncN9iSE2JL/67DFpe7LjJyrcqE bvXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ttlZTGy8mNn2nkmIeja+cSogvVMkl387iKJ49bhXk40=; b=BXD8YX10xOiJXqits8Zw+YUMGd1vxUCo307GryiPsONQRGs2Q95nhKfF4cHvSPBfsv YZmVsDEdKUxwcZxphWE96060K8gr6lQwVsXudIcYUMdQIIEoWORJsG7MD2bdW/4Ysnpz Mbhc+0NVbTgTVertRIGzHw95mZXrMO15RxMKRbYdqS/qJiOZyt70B3/GXFb4yQS/eIWQ 9WiyjJl84w8ClonjX4EjAiTE7+GUr/x1qhrB8hHO9PhnPHolOyapK2sqsVkpD0J/NdhV eZendZIsA7SdndiNI4AICa4hQo5JxAWzqj9oRIFYMpEDG2UAvZrAasT0ENgTY4hVgy3O v5IA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU2tIHIfpIwNjVha6izsZmcKoFBm5zWSjYyFdr7rKClboaLdXBP KZXeioGTVJzaE5d1ueCwNLHmMkdkmZI4RwWaOY2fKefH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJeWz2C41VRNMyu/v5LRJ0OfTW4Jr4K7FjcxedW7+2P1McItk/AtXi9GmNP3EexEeIEy1sPGGGOfhauIX3yvk=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:424b:: with SMTP id m11mr19381990lfl.163.1559736221263; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 05:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jiuhai Zhang <jiuhai.zhang@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 20:03:30 +0800
Message-ID: <CAG9+TpaByVDQZujwtRo9LHcqFn2cOxmy09y-JmVOAzMVroagVw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Is CONNECTION_CLOSE frame Ack-eliciting？
To: quic@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000696f21058a9263d8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Y7ofDFOQO37uhobvDFnpz4i3WN4>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 12:03:45 -0000

In https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-recovery-20#section-2

Ack-eliciting Frames:  All frames besides ACK or PADDING are
      considered ack-eliciting.


Is CONNECTION_CLOSE frame Ack-eliciting？

Should endpoint responds a ACK frame when receiving a CONNECTION_CLOSE frame？

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email