Weekly github digest (QUIC Working Group Specifications)

Github Notifications <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 18 March 2018 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15246124205 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=26lu2/+S; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=aagxmQFq
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mxzxanQ5lJX7 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D58D1201FA for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C8620B11 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:45:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:45:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=gZGNsyd7ZdwvZKFs3 d1kwqpeuMEWwjQ9t8IqemeV9q4=; b=26lu2/+SqoqwXVVQW3efyN7A5BLkZAgxs HfxIMAy/SMY8tm/PTHoPbIZ2vjsvDP4clC+Vf9Gqf0QD8yzRzlKWy9ijnTJ6TXrm Z1vr0d85R2GvVA2Hyyiv2C/O2Yhseii5F76qclAv7fPiCBru8OtpuvkeLsEJj0F6 ZeaGEnUbDVlD2b8JanGjaBjxlLzYphJOaySRL8hZexCcsg0YyU4LrO2zH9LD7DFv AzQTSoZo9NAq4poRxSJ1kKw3TfMTQhHl/Y0JhqOg0CLea3semWGjvX2ZTpCP3evG FOLfExsKxdNGQyAtCTWnz3zx8ytelW1cBuASxXGtUAyXq/mlL2Idg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=gZGNsyd7ZdwvZKFs3d1kwqpeuMEWwjQ9t8IqemeV9q4=; b=aagxmQFq ar1Fiyxu6lt7u3NyodwnegOsTaAyA5+6sSLEqxd8T+udREATQmKpzfHgb8wE5uKo YODscbpcxSNSQ1fS1iGRxNaCH4YdF87VkXFHExH2kYEW8oOAbWNSE9JbDmpCaHcy mNmKLCChUSjujwSXj1zxJuzpaX6X9fUqyCiv+OgLC4/lFwK15zIwQ7DUvOlcAieV doO36pPPbI3y3MQbkSCBG65Y9e92MjIevyfrdK/oCLzBrhH8zagQnDb7bhrPqJbo hyh7e9VR6va0MwHUe9rO2yBPb8IIJ8W/7ixfLAaXgDOFcrZrSNMDJ2Wz1o3vYhhx l6FGaBN0xH/ufA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:o7atWuzhALRymu8FRezv0N_L9vKuLFYU7Th2oSl8RItifpFXuJJFFQ>
Received: from cloud.mnot.net (cloud.mnot.net [119.9.43.241]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 684047E139 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:45:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cloud.mnot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cloud.mnot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43E5C5104 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 00:45:19 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============8389296194769165647=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Github Notifications <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Working Group Specifications)
Message-Id: <20180318004519.C43E5C5104@cloud.mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 00:45:19 +0000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/aqh245xIFC6rgzanV9afgNudyTU>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 00:45:28 -0000



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+4/-10/💬20)
  4 issues created:
  - don't apply congestion penalty for lost ack-only packets (by marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1221 
  - inconsistent definition of the TLP duration (by marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1220 
  - confusing Fast Retransmit modes (by marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1212 
  - Use Conservative Initial Packet Size (by mikkelfj)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1209 

  13 issues received 20 new comments:
  - #1197 Add unknown packet version handling to invariants (4 by martinthomson, mikkelfj)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1197 [-invariants] [design] 
  - #1115 Server responses to multiple Initial packets (2 by martinthomson, MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1115 [-transport] [design] 
  - #1148 Replace HPACK integer encoding (2 by krasic, MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1148 [-qpack] [design] 
  - #1174 Packet Number Gap and Connection Probing (2 by janaiyengar, mikkelfj)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1174 [-transport] [design] 
  - #1212 confusing Fast Retransmit modes (2 by siyengar, ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1212 
  - #837 Padding ACK-only packets (1 by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/837 [-recovery] [-transport] [design] [needs-discussion] 
  - #1085 Handshake failure with Retry and multiple Initial packets (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1085 [-tls] [design] 
  - #941 Resume HTTP/2 TLS from QUIC ? (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/941 [-http] [-tls] [design] [has-proposal] 
  - #829 Can a server use a Handshake packet for ACK of the last client Handshake packet (1 by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/829 [-tls] [-transport] [design] [needs-discussion] 
  - #1138 QCRAM encoding requires two passes (1 by afrind)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1138 [-qpack] [design] 
  - #1177 Stateless Reset Concerns (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1177 
  - #441 Priority grouping node ambiguity (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/441 [-http] [design] [needs-discussion] 
  - #602 End-to-Path Close Signal (1 by mnot)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/602 [-transport] [arch] [design] [parked] 

  10 issues closed:
  - Add unknown packet version handling to invariants https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1197 [-invariants] [design] 
  - Defaults for SETTINGS and 0-RTT https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1157 [-http] [design] [has-proposal] 
  - Ban trial decryption in TLS stream after rejected early data? https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1172 [-tls] [design] 
  - Stateless Reset Concerns https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1177 
  - Server responses to multiple Initial packets https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1115 [-transport] [design] 
  - Retry packet and PADDING https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1067 [-transport] [editor-ready] 
  - Signal from TLS that this needs to be a Retry https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1061 [-tls] [design] 
  - STOP_SENDING before stream open https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1050 [-transport] [design] 
  - min_rtt could stay 0 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1169 [-recovery] 
  - Handshake failure with Retry and multiple Initial packets https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1085 [-tls] [design] 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+14/-18/💬19)
  14 pull requests submitted:
  - don't apply congestion penalty for lost ack-only packets (by marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1223 
  - Only pace retransmittable packets (by ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1222 
  - loss recovery timers are based on time of last retransmittable packet (by marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1219 
  - use the kMinTLPTimeout constant in the TLP description (by marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1218 
  - use the kMinRTOTimeout constant in the RTO description (by marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1217 
  - Change CID after inactivity (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1214 [-transport] 
  - Retransmit data, not frames (by ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1213 
  - No more Retransmittable (by ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1211 
  - 0rtt after retry (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1208 
  - Initial SETTINGS values (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1207 [-http] 
  - Rename 'Open' to 'Ready' for send streams (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1205 
  - Move section on TLP to Congestion Control (by ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1203 
  - Specify pacing in a bit more detail. (by janaiyengar)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1202 
  - Addressing issue#1147 (by seanturner)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1201 

  7 pull requests received 19 new comments:
  - #1219 loss recovery timers are based on time of last retransmittable packet (5 by siyengar, mikkelfj, marten-seemann, mcmanus, ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1219 
  - #1211 No more Ackable (4 by martinthomson, ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1211 
  - #1193 Remove implicit stream opening (3 by marten-seemann, ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1193 
  - #882 require ACKs and allow PADDING in the Server Stateless Retry packet (3 by marten-seemann, janaiyengar, MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/882 
  - #1222 Only pace retransmittable packets (2 by mikkelfj, ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1222 
  - #1201 Addressing issue#1147 (1 by seanturner)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1201 
  - #1215 Remove confusing text about ports (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1215 [-http] 

  18 pull requests merged:
  - loss recovery timers are based on time of last retransmittable packet
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1219 
  - No more Ackable
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1211 
  - Don't imply that Version Negotiation is always sent
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1216 [-invariants] 
  - use the kMinRTOTimeout constant in the RTO description
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1217 
  - use the kMinTLPTimeout constant in the TLP description
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1218 
  - Remove confusing text about ports
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1215 [-http] 
  - Retransmit data, not frames
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1213 
  - Remove cross-protocol resumption
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1057 [-tls] 
  - Initial SETTINGS values
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1207 [-http] 
  - Transport parameters are stream counts, not IDs
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1065 
  - 0rtt after retry
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1208 
  - Rename 'Open' to 'Ready' for send streams
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1205 
  - require ACKs and allow PADDING in the Server Stateless Retry packet
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/882 
  - Create a signal about HelloRetryRequest
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1199 
  - Remove discussion of entry overhead
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1200 [-qpack] [design] 
  - Specify pacing in a bit more detail.
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1202 
  - Move section on TLP to Congestion Control
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1203 
  - Addressing issue#1147
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1201 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts