IETF Logo Mail Archive

Who wants -10 drafts?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 21 February 2018 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0008B12E85B for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:00:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id klGv2bF-tTo0 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:00:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8022A12E76A for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:00:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j79so7182507oib.12 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:00:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g7SDyM16WyO73EwKlJIvSD+LahM1YPm7aSdPp9US938=; b=PFpsQhgD2R9C6T5iW3kIjekattVuJAMuof0Ami2LzUN2kRb0Z1r9SRYcmKCajxBqTE G3YyQTPaZX21kwXj35Fd81dslMuoDb2y8udoNMqOJPvP7wh9oOegwHCKZc15DKyRLYiz 7oE2q/bFjelm9nnvEzQ6b4u2ac0EYCJxkmyNTcte5ICH7uVnPLUjhykFmWYw974AKrY6 vhJ0cR0eONCWBChNKYH4YRV00cql+nA3BERBWuODPAqVVnQk/lsw4oKQePoteP+CL7IE G9AyzYxIp5aX4Wnjf0VxjKwz75c3rnks3FjzuNt/UN/5K3UmIHrO3Y9IK0C+qs02FgVv Iv7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g7SDyM16WyO73EwKlJIvSD+LahM1YPm7aSdPp9US938=; b=lmD1FHweLcM9+dhyN2hdEIS9tY/fF9/qeD1KZBNX64U2KgjrneCHXl5jF58qovHExY rA1oHJGt9v9vl7ho9ctCRMsdA+wW6i8wMquQoFKYsS6iAiOsZJs42rAFAoLBpGeuf78l 8LRWq4TAGPfMohtj0MpHeoFIqd0qtjRimxoSwr+79eAuoK0+FCI9DkpFQTGFXqo/meDp QkidPvf7LL3Ooy+PFdM0mbxk8gGm7CDApZx1ZyB2xzc3mDd4KIsaH32B6CQmCIKYqIYA IKS+yrAbxErXRP2yYKkVcM0Bxo8fQY0psHD46NaPu+a6KX2f/8fGq3gdYb6iQlpfsYeG NwtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCjt+WPnGXZLsHclyviArmntJH2YcOT2P8TwRoPqw9o4PjOAcuA oYOBAwxMK22LHjLwdrahqAfh3eqoT8HZ5GsR0rTdBw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsQZhYpcBJMBx3awtzAFdE5Asc03daYBhbDJ4ioV/T4gWAo+2dh5IHEDd9uMA70dBgAEamaqMosRj5p5wVnTgo=
X-Received: by 10.202.94.196 with SMTP id s187mr983470oib.144.1519174840462; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:00:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.16.85 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:00:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:00:40 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVWdRYDKUwgrfTjRmb9q_M9bAiysVYy-zDicGLrEGcvng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Who wants -10 drafts?
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/qNyEwbhZ0zeXoPdPDYjK8fzqh7w>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 01:00:44 -0000

I know, I know, you are probably still struggling your way through
interop with -09, but the editors want to know if people want a set of
drafts that reference the newly added QCRAM and invariants docs.

There would be no change to interop targets.

We were originally hoping to include fixes to the bigger open issues,
but those seem unlikely to resolve in time for the March 5 draft
submission cutoff.  And now there might be some people who want to try
out hq-10 now that it has a plausible header compression story.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email