RST_STREAM for send-only stream
Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Tue, 09 January 2018 16:59 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6D112D880 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:59:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b44whIKd7ZVe for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com (mail-wr0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27B0012D87F for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id p6so14817254wrd.0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:59:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6g2LtmNmgVl1waeDTqVhROr+vNIGMzmE+u2x9mFlzRc=; b=eObFkE6z1XYXGVqK2t0Gv0lAVQpxgbfYl640PEdg4pLgfrCf+wMTpgoaRTBF6dXjaJ WF01Zjg7dumNPSS8Ao+uy9gxuZ/ElLDZHotCCzi9xb2QawNVMgio7Mz7lRNEXMUolorm Jmr+UxRFTXa5GUQQR8UaSFJByt/WvB37EE7EsIDCQiuAoJUxFNa1SpBwJnTsH9S9SpiN m3IGkFotzDVjNmFc6gajJ3dTKz9zQYhu/4Xs1/C7nu+ZMkNGSTWSRNCnP3TEJ3Np+bVI gWYDdpkf1BsaT8YaRLLo3iEJUaFZ+HSSJtBVZXg5d60CehxeZaQ3abKtx/rGGA/qmM8m wQ0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6g2LtmNmgVl1waeDTqVhROr+vNIGMzmE+u2x9mFlzRc=; b=jw0giVQJJySjfB5qqokZIOttsfLVIVoovlal+GequiH8vdeuY1iDt8xvRjTVfjD9v4 gLJ/GfzFALZe7g5B9q5rDbJ5lhsppf+NA9zHWPXyHQYlu4JZcsgdm5apBIkxoikatRxq H1JMXDeVcNlKb0FkFcPj7EVYBvhheVnsvgSKbuOaMTKtsjJu+xWU3TRzprWFDPHGcgGe RNRoREGk+TPfWCkHXEKsiQRdDsaYN2zugBOQLqjiHNOMKd4pQD8i/VVGVbLv/vx/TVhf dFHt9ULV3N2VdAHxhMgB0le4a2PJrtmjM3dpwc5RUJdEzsL69zoNNFYVer1Tx/y5cpu/ hJCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKvvvPtxRtNCJRJhYHtnnfqkbo3XansYOgZ+BMHRObJaPh/jWLT dwZvjxydCtUl+xGonVqLX33ZBmqb/l2FOw8JhrFWjA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotrCoZHD9xvQU6clm3rWLdsob4QsekzNh3DybabhU2nICiA6fKwUqA1U9BZoCGxAZj99YEotNSmCFooPGBuhjc=
X-Received: by 10.223.151.142 with SMTP id s14mr13406115wrb.256.1515517160479; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:59:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.128.1 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:59:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:59:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM4esxRdrumkRrPueUgz1zJUVB6Y=JX2PxZfvPn+fNHGjdUDgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RST_STREAM for send-only stream
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1b5622005e9c05625ad61f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/roO3xt2p5FVq9oNs8fcRviw5A78>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 16:59:23 -0000
Is it a fatal error if I receive a RST_STREAM for my send-only stream? Is it PROTOCOL_VIOLATION or STREAM_STATE_ERROR? connection-level or stream-level? or should I drop the packet? drop the frame?
- RST_STREAM for send-only stream Martin Duke
- RE: RST_STREAM for send-only stream Mike Bishop
- Re: RST_STREAM for send-only stream Ian Swett
- Re: RST_STREAM for send-only stream Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- Re: RST_STREAM for send-only stream Martin Duke