IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: What CSRs Do

Frode Kileng <frodeki@gmail.com> Fri, 22 November 2019 03:07 UTC

Return-Path: <frodeki@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68570120836 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:07:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bo03NBw7xvq5 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:07:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1F412018B for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:07:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id z4so2746257pfn.12 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:07:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=IsA+/DpLX/8nB5tgtRdiOmuSAeh4022ezydhXZpiUJM=; b=Wn4XcN7BwF9kF91vdaT18jgiJ6n68fvE+Seghtr52SbcGLEn5RiNldlFQRmYDVHki9 dkgGU+2kqMDO+Btd8nbfFBEBlFF2W6wvXBGuvnfinqzfZOVWk9SWmQPCsfC4rA0wQ8MB YfYe2X3M5QMRhHcMEhSv7eEvXZJVI05TsQOP8U58V+FLlifID3rRv9o8EAp+1PAGII8B vpIjdH+UYRm7ed4vnrWRAJ+Lsi7eCBkBgNAllSLrUumX/QAk5Ls/aZoJHbdkVNgo3jWG +iw9OJ4ejy6U0GsVaVBWR9iamC4STucLXAUSCdl4evt5O+Wczb40zzqpweLcL3rqdhhH 5x7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=IsA+/DpLX/8nB5tgtRdiOmuSAeh4022ezydhXZpiUJM=; b=VhXj+Rdkb2YNd/QX5da7fxZxtyHbGT46NQMmcd3akQmUKZ41DdEGprxLd9VL5xQkXQ bagZogw8W9/xx8Qws8yrQOJlvPkBV4NYzdsqZZWEPe7i1+FYMjTw63uJwuEtIqsWXW/M cde8V+rSIC/lR3qWnNLF39DKLUzSY5thR+Ssky9WdNWgpkd7fbRnHe/uHdgzbX3v/X09 Fv6e/+F3Y8qgZs9P+4qGW7TNd31Vhtvcsu7JqOulsucQsqXdNNITp7Q6UoWZs/eQstOq fpNM7CR9WLh8mP3ipYqNcnFSuVvI61cKqnB6przX7EEMJz77FSFDRZeWesv17ju3BOWC rL3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWUcM0M0sC09ElBrlLf88OD4/On59zIT+FlKmFeJTBcobnTUioo gQD+7pE6bvns8duIC/eiNI0Ws1Tr
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMu7DcoUWXEGFUEO7QJCAsSBWhRW1ThRdVJKTA0gCrNbW0IJZGW0FrvPtmGVr2eurZXVXn3Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:cf4f:: with SMTP id b15mr13311905pgj.216.1574392074889; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:07:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:deb:727b:9d2c:94c1? ([2001:67c:370:128:deb:727b:9d2c:94c1]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e59sm877274pjk.28.2019.11.21.19.07.53 for <quic@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:07:54 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: What CSRs Do
To: quic@ietf.org
References: <BL0PR11MB3394D769128DEFEEFBC3CA71904C0@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <0cf4d3ad-0f64-0ae4-2d95-77a39f40639d@tele.no> <20191119042904.GC5602@1wt.eu> <4003626d-8966-6772-7df0-e76549320430@gmail.com> <1574144751435.15844@akamai.com> <bc0cf83f-16d6-3200-5d6e-091311ccf9a7@tele.no> <7268_1574344734_5DD6981E_7268_134_1_1574344750.3872.4.camel@orange.com>
From: Frode Kileng <frodeki@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ff683bc6-6b10-8720-8e18-b448bb0dfd21@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:07:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7268_1574344734_5DD6981E_7268_134_1_1574344750.3872.4.camel@orange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/vR4mO7YtIk6U-ByYginNEEDUyp8>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:07:57 -0000

On 21/11/2019 14:59, alexandre.ferrieux@orange.com wrote:
> To *lack* these sources, one might be incompetent, as you are
> suggesting many people are. Alternatively, one might simply care about
> a long end-to-end path with several responsibility boundaries, which by
> definition are opaque. In this case, as Igor said, the
> upstream/downstream location is absolutely crucial.


When in https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3189 stating that 
"Shipping v1 without loss observation support would undermine day-to-day 
network maintenance work in at least that part of the ecosystem", naming 
a list of "supporters" and "The list is growing daily", I do think in 
all fairness it is important to indicate that this view is not 
necessarily an universal truth and a view is supported by everyone in 
"this part of the ecosystem". And that it should be possible to indicate 
this, giving a rationale and without being accused for claiming someone 
is "incompetent".

frodek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email