Re: Consensus calls, Post-Singapore

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 09 December 2019 00:26 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Subject: Re: Consensus calls, Post-Singapore
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CCD077BB-2276-4375-BCBF-CB51DDE6DCE7@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 11:26:23 +1100
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A0D9AB21-D67E-474B-AC67-32834CE3E46E@mnot.net>
References: <CCD077BB-2276-4375-BCBF-CB51DDE6DCE7@mnot.net>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/voKkeoWpl5J7qtZkTJcDfIiXhls>
Precedence: list

Hearing no pushback, consensus declared.


> On 29 Nov 2019, at 12:40 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them late next week.
> 
> Note that this group of issues includes some HTTP and recovery issues, as those documents are now under the Late Stage Process.
> 
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
> 
> * #3258: Allow CRYPTO_BUFFER_EXCEEEDED error when CRYPTO frame goes beyond 2^62 bytes
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3186>
> 
> * #3256: Packet reordering thresholds less than 3 are not sufficiently reordering tolerant
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3240>
> 
> * #3200: Definition of "active connection ID" is misleading (or the name is)
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3201>
> 
> * #3197: active_connection_id_limit defaults to 0
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3201>
> 
> * #3193: active_connection_id_limit interacts poorly with Retire Prior To
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3201>
> 
> * #3159: Server should not accept 1-RTT traffic before handshake completion
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3224>
> 
> * #3130: Does it matter if the the STOP_SENDING error code is something other than EARLY RESPONSE?
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3208>
> 
> * #3111: [Version Ossification] Alternative version and Initial Salt should be part of NEW_TOKEN
>   The proposal is to close this with no action, but we may consider it for QUICv2 and/or an extension in the future.
> 
> * #3102: Add provisional registration for all registries
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3170>
> 
> * #3020: Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3170>
> 
> * #2792: Timing side-channel on key updates
>   The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3263>
> 
> * #2496: QUIC Version Ossification
>   The proposal is to close this with no action, but we may consider it for QUICv2 and/or an extension in the future.
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Consensus calls, Post-Singapore Mark Nottingham
Re: Consensus calls, Post-Singapore Mark Nottingham