IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Raw] technologies document

"Georgios Z. Papadopoulos" <georgios.papadopoulos@imt-atlantique.fr> Fri, 17 May 2019 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <georgios.papadopoulos@imt-atlantique.fr>
X-Original-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: raw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123EE12025F for <raw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2019 04:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=imt-atlantique.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w1VEgZs1We_a for <raw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2019 04:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr (zproxy120.enst.fr [137.194.2.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E131201D1 for <raw@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2019 04:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C019080816; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:17:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy120.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 5uyCR5m_W0XA; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:17:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F9680F27; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:17:53 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zproxy120.enst.fr E0F9680F27
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imt-atlantique.fr; s=50EA75E8-DE22-11E6-A6DE-0662BA474D24; t=1558091873; bh=eqbGBENJdnIHS3/4VNgUIaTOOkp515LZXqY09ZMzse4=; h=Mime-Version:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=Zg2TtQ1HoMAVODs4Nj7y2dlmaClZdcmTXqKmXHyfCSyJHkEoEggYO8e8RDx4KAvAQ lknrwtuoCj0gMUxecId5oNyEyI+CHWo9fe/keyfR+k80enZLD0N/5/surfz2afz0ZZ qOPkBd3zfq6nmqlXGXJo646qviehv3Sa/UP6mVuQ=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy120.enst.fr
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy120.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 05_W4hjsXAax; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:17:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e0a:170:d730:51fd:4dd7:66be:cfda] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:170:d730:51fd:4dd7:66be:cfda]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C60F80EAD; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:17:53 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F2A7146A-B8AF-45B4-BA33-F0D6EE97334A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: "Georgios Z. Papadopoulos" <georgios.papadopoulos@imt-atlantique.fr>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35653887259770A27F0CAF4CD80B0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 13:18:22 +0200
Cc: "raw@ietf.org" <raw@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <BC3C1E20-9DFA-4814-AF0A-D6F34E12E7D3@imt-atlantique.fr>
References: <MN2PR11MB35653887259770A27F0CAF4CD80B0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/raw/RtzWbPMaO27MrKrckv3hTqw8nus>
Subject: Re: [Raw] technologies document
X-BeenThere: raw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: reliable and available wireless <raw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/raw/>
List-Post: <mailto:raw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raw>, <mailto:raw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 11:17:59 -0000

Dear Pascal,

I would be glad to contribute on 802.15.4 TSCH.

Georgios


> On May 17, 2019, at 11:30, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear all
>  
> We are missing activity to justify a BoF in Montreal.. A good starting point – and a low hanging fruit - for us is to kick off the technology draft. Something inspired by https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8376 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8376> and possibly taking information off other docs such as https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7554 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7554>.
>  
> The idea of that draft would be to describe the characteristics of the technologies that RAW would deal with, in particular 802..11 EHT, 3GPP URLLC and 802.15.4 TSCH.
>  
> On top of the usual description, we’d need information such as the capability to schedule resources and typical rates, typically for a constant DetNet flow that can be expressed in frame size and period. The draft should also cover applicability to Use Uses such as presented in the use cases draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-spawn-use-cases-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-spawn-use-cases-00>)
>  
> I can provide  a skeleton for the document, but need authors to commit to the work.
>  
> Who’s in?
>  
> Pascal
> -- 
> Raw mailing list
> Raw@ietf.org <mailto:Raw@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raw <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raw>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email