Re: [regext] REGEXT Fee Document

[Patrick Mevzek <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017, at 00:39, Gould, James wrote:
> 2.      Add a new optional “standard” boolean attribute to the
> <fee:command> element, with the default value of “0” (or “false”), that
> indicates whether the fees for the command and period matches the
> “standard” classification fees for the command and period.

I am not very happy with the addition of yet another element.
The extension is getting more and more complex.
I believe that such attribute is not completely unrelated to the class
value,
so there is something related to the model that does not feel right to
me.
This is in fact seen in this sentence:
> b.      All of the <fee:command> elements for a “standard” classification
> domain name, would have standard=”1”.

It shows the two values are not independant, so there is a kind of
duplication
of information.

I think that in that case having the class element per command instead
of per domain would be a better choice than adding an attribute.


-- 
  Patrick Mevzek
  [e-mail]