IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Sun, 15 July 2018 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9A1130E89 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 15:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z6E6i5EFVaJH for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96111130E8F for <regext@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-9259.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9259.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.146.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w6FMPgLr056297 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 15 Jul 2018 17:25:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'regext@ietf.org'" <regext@ietf.org>, "'draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag@tools.ietf.org'" <draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag@tools.ietf.org>
References: <7426e645-9de3-20ed-f4c4-7e1f46703233@nostrum.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7FA73B18@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <02b19628-470c-124c-1fb1-8c622e3bd592@nostrum.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7FA7533B@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <66aaa434-de52-f763-0a99-052f59306e8f@nostrum.com> <da8f799292e94daa8d8c632fadd18897@verisign.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <e2020da5-f8e3-7b1f-3cb1-7dae3c390163@nostrum.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 18:25:42 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <da8f799292e94daa8d8c632fadd18897@verisign.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/egDZeKJmwuS-eCuK2VrpNaOztZY>
Subject: Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 22:25:49 -0000

Thanks! I have issued an IESG ballot for this document, and it will be 
scheduled on the next available telechat (which is to say, the next 
telechat that has not exceeded its maximum page count).

/a

On 7/15/18 18:11, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2018 2:37 PM
>> To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>; Hollenbeck, Scott
>> <shollenbeck@verisign.com>; 'regext@ietf.org' <regext@ietf.org>; 'draft-
>> ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag@tools.ietf.org' <draft-ietf-regext-rdap-
>> object-tag@tools.ietf.org>
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-
>> tag
> [snip]
>
>>>> Thanks for the explanations. Based on what you've said, I think this
>>>> is ready for IETF last call -- you can treat my comment for
>>>> clarification of the example as an IETF last call comment, and
>>>> address it along with any other feedback you receive during last call.
>>> Will do - thanks!
>> IETF Last Call has concluded, and I didn't see any other comments that
>> would necessitate changes in the document. Just to make sure we're on the
>> same page, I'm waiting on a -04 version of the document reflecting the
>> above change prior to asking for the IESG to ballot on the document.
>> Let me know if that's not what you expect.
> The document has just been updated.
>
> Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email