Re: [regext] New-AD review of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-09

[Jiankang Yao <[e-mail]>]

Dear Barry,

      Thanks a lot. We will update a new version based on your guidance.

Best Regards 
Jiankang Yao 

From my phone

> 在 2019年6月22日，02:28，Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> 写道：
> 
> Hey, regext folks,
> 
> This document had an AD review from Adam, a Gen-ART review from Joel,
> and a SecDir review from Russ, and went through IETF last call.  All
> three reviews were responded to on the regext mailing list (by
> Jiankang and by Antoine), but there has been no revision of the draft
> to address the issues raised.  That has to happen.
> 
> While we're there, there's the issue of the Informational status and
> the registrant contact for the namespace:
> 
> It's my understanding that this isn't specifying a standard, but,
> rather, is documenting an existing non-standard extension that is not
> expected to be a standard nor widely implemented.  Is that correct?
> 
> If so, the document should make that clear in the Abstract (briefly)
> and in the Introduction (somewhat less briefly).
> 
> Also, the shepherd writeup doesn't help me understand why this is
> Informational, and it should: (from the writeup text, emphasis mine)
> "Explain briefly what the intent of the document is (the document's
> abstract is usually good for this), and WHY THE WORKING GROUP HAS
> CHOSEN THE REQUESTED PUBLICATION TYPE".  You say the working group
> decided, but you don't say why.
> 
> So:
> Please revise the draft to address the last call reviews, and also
> please add something to the Introduction (and possibly the Abstract)
> to explain the status of the document, making clear what the standards
> or non-standards status is and what applicability we expect for it.
> 
> I'm putting this into a "Revised I-D Needed" substate, awaiting such revision.
> 
> Thanks,
> Barry