[rfc-i] Units
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter) Wed, 28 January 2015 21:44 UTC
From: "brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com"
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:44:34 +1300
Subject: [rfc-i] Units
In-Reply-To: <07491C34-F9E7-4760-AFD6-8643684DAC8F@fugue.com>
References: <54C95559.30103@gmail.com> <07491C34-F9E7-4760-AFD6-8643684DAC8F@fugue.com>
Message-ID: <54C95842.3000508@gmail.com>
On 29/01/2015 10:34, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, do we have a policy for units in RFCs? It seems to me that we should
>> not use quaint local measurements like acres. We should (as a style guide
>> issue) use scientific, i.e. metric, units, as in "a 40 hectare data center",
>
> I don't think that would help. The average reader will have no idea how big an acre is anyway. Better to use square dimensions.
In this specific case, perhaps, but several billion people are
more likely to understand "hectare" than "acre". Anyway my question
is more one or principle: should the style guide call for SI units (
which is the official name)?
Brian
- [rfc-i] Units Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] Units Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] Units Ted Lemon
- [rfc-i] Units Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] Units Andrew Sullivan
- [rfc-i] Units Sean Leonard
- [rfc-i] Units Donald Eastlake
- [rfc-i] Units Andrew Sullivan
- [rfc-i] Units Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] Units John Levine
- [rfc-i] Units Sean Leonard
- [rfc-i] Units Elwyn Davies
- [rfc-i] Units "Martin J. Dürst"
- [rfc-i] Units Bjoern Hoehrmann
- [rfc-i] Units Dick Franks
- [rfc-i] Units Carsten Bormann
- [rfc-i] Units Cullen Jennings
- [rfc-i] Units Ted Lemon
- [rfc-i] Units Heather Flanagan RFC Series Editor
- [rfc-i] Units Ole Jacobsen
- [rfc-i] Units Eric Burger
- [rfc-i] Units Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] Units John Levine