IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-rseme-00.txt

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 30 October 2019 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A431208E9 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7hBK_akKiB0O for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3827F12013C for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB29F40738; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8F3F40738; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1_T1URnL7hXz; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3B7F40737; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6631D6601EB; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:48:38 +0200 (EET)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oVhtGu64tJLe; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:48:37 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 578F7660122; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:48:37 +0200 (EET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <E9E92899-87E7-4036-8182-3330622DE71C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:48:37 +0200
Message-Id: <DD26A382-4570-4B38-9DBC-07D1F7F4A045@piuha.net>
References: <157195362260.11387.2707786903653263155.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E9E92899-87E7-4036-8182-3330622DE71C@rfc-editor.org>
To: Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-rseme-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, RSOC <rsoc@iab.org>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi Heather,

I’ve read the -01 and feel that it is a reasonable way forward. I only attended one of the meetings, but the document seems to reflect the discussion accurately. I do agree with Alissa’s point though :-)

Thanks for the work for running these discussions and writing this up!

Jari

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email