Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-06.txt

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Wed, 29 March 2017 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D471294FF for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r30Y75gBxlek for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91DDD1272E1 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.209.157.46] (port=9751 helo=glaroam2-177-18.wireless.gla.ac.uk) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1ctHM0-0003ac-8P; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:25:53 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Message-Id: <5FEE432C-6F1A-48BF-8E9E-BAE20EFF28B7@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A881E23F-ED74-4E26-881E-5FEA7D1B6579"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:25:48 +0100
In-Reply-To: <76E12E4D-9E0C-43B3-B30A-C4E7C6A69909@ifi.uio.no>
Cc: "rmcat@ietf.org WG" <rmcat@ietf.org>, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, Stein Gjessing <steing@ifi.uio.no>
To: Safiqul Islam <safiquli@ifi.uio.no>
References: <149070616465.30521.13205282250119884347@ietfa.amsl.com> <76E12E4D-9E0C-43B3-B30A-C4E7C6A69909@ifi.uio.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -28
X-Mythic-Debug: State = no_sa; Score =
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/_qRABzPeQSLUu0FSlTBeK9paJ9w>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-06.txt
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:25:56 -0000

Thanks.

I’ll now proceed with the IESG write-up and publication request (most likely next week).

Colin



> On 28 Mar 2017, at 14:14, Safiqul Islam <safiquli@ifi.uio.no>; wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> JFYI: we have now incorporated Colin’s comments. 
> 
> Regards,
> Safiqul
> 
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-06.txt
>> Date: 28 March 2017 at 15:02:44 GMT+2
>> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>
>> Cc: rmcat@ietf.org <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
>> 
>> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques of the IETF.
>> 
>>        Title           : Coupled congestion control for RTP media
>>        Authors         : Safiqul Islam
>>                          Michael Welzl
>>                          Stein Gjessing
>> Filename        : draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-06.txt
>> Pages           : 26
>> Date            : 2017-03-28
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>   When multiple congestion controlled RTP sessions traverse the same
>>   network bottleneck, combining their controls can improve the total
>>   on-the-wire behavior in terms of delay, loss and fairness.  This
>>   document describes such a method for flows that have the same sender,
>>   in a way that is as flexible and simple as possible while minimizing
>>   the amount of changes needed to existing RTP applications.  It
>>   specifies how to apply the method for the NADA congestion control
>>   algorithm, and provides suggestions on how to apply it to other
>>   congestion control algorithms.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc/>
>> 
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-06
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-06
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-06
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/