Re: [Roll-bier-dt] Fwd: Bier interim in January

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

Just a high-level comment/question…. Off topic...

I’m hoping that "to set the stage for the set of required followup
documents specifying the solution” means that the informational document(s)
will most likely serve their purpose as inspiration for the solution
only…and not be published as RFCs.  Is that the intent?  Or is the intent
to publish that as requirements, framework, or whatever-else RFCs…and
*later* work on solutions?

I realize that without knowing the specific content of those document it
may be hard to provide a definite answer…so I’m just looking for intent at
this point.

Thanks!

Alvaro.


On November 28, 2018 at 11:25:19 AM, Toerless Eckert ([e-mail]) wrote:

a) Lets first determine what the next step is in the documents for
roll-bier that we want to achieve by IETF104.

Ines was suggesting that we should consider a high-level overview
draft, for example reformatting into draft form what we had worked
out in slides and the etherpad in the design team. Primarily goal
would be to set the stage for the set of required followup documents
specifying the solution.

I could take a stab at that, but maybe good parts of this should come
fro pascals document, e.g.: splitting up the informational parts from
the normative parts and extending on the informational ones .. ?

And then fesible next steps for the drafts specifying the solution.
Right now the primary documents existing are the one from pascal
and carsten, so i would like their input for how they could see
those documents evolve until 104.

Please chime in if this is the right goal, and if so, what it should
entail.