[Roll] AODV-RPL

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 20 July 2017 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CB012704A for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FJM3E-SkdE0D for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x235.google.com (mail-ua0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BA72126E3A for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x235.google.com with SMTP id d29so12787594uai.2 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=J2UaWfV7ZEsqKWO7EfCBHQpjEn7lmzPv0CjgaXLwrJU=; b=o6NoG+16rwJonXgtZagvb/HtXf648NlN56bNR6nSN9Qd4Rnh1pdPMeYDFeQv2OhakJ LMmK/oQ2cO3W+mCjaaFpR7VRiY0cd6Aawr8NXrEQ63dB4kLU4uxPjWYnnjY8tdQyLJUK DiA/xtUIFsiRuHWkw/NILD30hG7LHKj0vOkMAGdn1OOI2lCBP4wwckUqMcEB8CIGyjoe CFY2Xw8DMX7thiDV6IFYLdlRAgmTJPSRHxJe5vV7V3u8kaAQyJ8hDVP+pJAqDoxIlJm1 x+rb8NNxQhnC4pdo207q2lV8GHu6UwxM/neBSxnrRp+fsW82lFlZeba/3rlHrrXMSPbL UmGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=J2UaWfV7ZEsqKWO7EfCBHQpjEn7lmzPv0CjgaXLwrJU=; b=tTXmc9ClHuE182zn9UVXDiFMUq/ZTTy4gOz+0dGkMrcBaghVHPZPssUKQgSa/u4aiE rqD7mBaBp9mVPCEvWVnBU1ru+O/VogyekFi3Xuz92TQBHJozmRwmoUE+HyJi4y7xd1Lb vnaGk0MAutoSga+lb7aPjRFzkHq+0SwKeupHWuCepMkq4ExTKQnjc2K9ZD/57qJ3v9C5 rcBUR1hLc6HUYUU5AD2L5qq6OfhZV+5/d4u/yUk0lSr7PDzbyvyrv7idu+Z3q/EHRyT1 C4z+A7NHqux9aVexCHJ3VK/LtVoDuAvYmj/ykQLJlaYat7UT9/It7xZhkYRAaLUtt2wc NjuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112Y5/OjiF5B2EEr+ouoSSliVr70mvsExQ8t5wDgQ3uqOHg+nRx1 OgAW3u75i5SNp9DoJ0sxYpcdm6C3OA==
X-Received: by 10.176.71.82 with SMTP id i18mr2306411uac.171.1500555530836; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.90.71 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:58:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp2i7PmbwsBvL1NGhPy17zP=M9vKkD-b2riAYaTJ1rjPvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e6328619fe50554bf4f93"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/820JmTtbETJClVz-jqjkdJnkOgc>
Subject: [Roll] AODV-RPL
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:58:54 -0000

Hi Charlie,

I checked the backup slides and found comparison between Default RPL and
AODV-RPL for P2P traffic ... I feel its not fair to compare between these
two, since by design default RPL is optimised for MP2P/P2MP traffic ... I
suggest to do the comparison between P2P-RPL and AODV-RPL.

Regards,
Rahul