IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25: (with COMMENT)

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Fri, 17 May 2019 08:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC184120127; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8b8h0vSh8SoE; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x133.google.com (mail-it1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E560120047; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x133.google.com with SMTP id i63so10787088ita.3; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ba+N0o9MVyBvIs55UVhQmj9OkzpqenREUYVGTK/YyiQ=; b=fuLuRkYh/l10922zvOUG0AgUAN+hIPx6xF1JlwPINxg0O4q11DCtoTaCZFwpj9qT1a /eVrsDkw1avEC9E2ynnD/+KyvQuD1FKumOGvPDKMwPTBruHF1zY3B+BWr7penm0WKUKt 5TmqLaNyU3dP1U+l4wea8LBNYxkylBwl5pWWf/bSf5aySa3O2BblMwJLNtcitOFtXSbp k/jmnfapps03Q2mzDaVGT3gVtF2a0n4kRakq3k7gAiArDLpXSt7XIgdVPpNC2ClgkPAg jk8SAIkaL97eoKOPN0vGS1NHrmGtqinhjsmyyXJQYzwla3gpFjln4RMDNf6xToUt3vlH cfvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ba+N0o9MVyBvIs55UVhQmj9OkzpqenREUYVGTK/YyiQ=; b=cNiDt48f7ZqN2IifcEpY/pNeVkWirek+i5fGAXBspZHrYBH257H7LUeCYtkeQ68tJ3 e1e3+cdxpicsl5+42S6a2SlYJGI+45Al2z8KRlY9iPJxJWmYl6mGzggVLwmJubT3eee2 +T9lHNKo/EuICmReovKFjs1DGU+ou3bMnRo2v3rm8+0gejE+Vb+vcAM0Gts835JWwim+ JH2ZF1ww6glHF22/MjihcQtnFUk4wq7zWDkAJWOEV+/+JvLFnHPqDJVIEqnor7XvsAYa WPF1OGnzDxI6k7UKULpmbUQ+9tbAsGWCfdkNQnfWnPHXHXYUk9bn/l11xAYKIGr/NPTa 4cCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWXqrjCU7rH2iFeFDk5AM1Buu8gRdXvEi1xwWWparyBDKNRhbP1 ZS1qTMEHoFJ5o5+PAHfsbYCx7t3yioqmkpcr/FE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwG9GG0l8yS3ahmqpWlY0qhs3oLUKvJUk3Cmuz3Mop8JofQS7juNcWZJ9ZnauB7kB/64eKktQwB8cEAOB+mEYI=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:81d4:: with SMTP id q203mr12683296itd.55.1558083589491; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155665035621.7536.208543956693234352.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155665035621.7536.208543956693234352.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 11:59:38 +0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUfAuWo6XQOR+qRHKGOBcswEZ2WqW3zva4AgE=rKucD6yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo@ietf.org, Peter Van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, roll-chairs <roll-chairs@ietf.org>, roll <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e1d0160589119ad3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/E0dDS6HmJhayqcybsmRhUueb-vY>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 08:59:52 -0000

Hi Alissa,

Thank you for your review. We have fixed them (deleted them) in the new
version.

Have a nice day,

Ines, Michael and Pascal.

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:52 PM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> = Section 1 =
>
> "An interim meeting went through the 24 cases defined here to discover
>    if there were any shortcuts, and this document is the result of that
>    discussion."
>
> These details seem unnecessary to include in an archival document.
>
> = Section 3.1 =
>
> "[RFCXXXX] represents this document."
>
> This is not necessary to include.
>
> = Section 9 =
>
> "Related to the deployment of RPL, there are no known multivendor
>    deployments outside of the research groups!  All known deployments of
>    RPL are in market verticals, with a single vendor providing all
>    components.  Research groups typically are using Contiki, RiotOS, or
>    OpenWSN, and these are easily adapted to 0x23 functionality."
>
> It seems like this text should be dropped or marked for removal once the
> RFC is
> published, since it will likely become out-of-date soon enough.
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email