[Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt

Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Thu, 21 March 2013 04:55 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=78581f61c=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A74921F8585 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHndL+ptXBxo for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip3mta.uwm.edu (ip3mta.uwm.edu [129.89.7.192]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A11621F8E38 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqoEACqRSlF/AAAB/2dsb2JhbABDhUeCWr0bgW+DGAEBAQQBAQEgSzcEAQEDAg0ZAikmAggGEwmICwcFoTSOVYkriQ+BI4w+exIXEgaCJ4ETA4h1jWuBH49jgyiCCg
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta01.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4E21210FA for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:55:47 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from mta01.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta01.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oSf2jZP159cw for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:55:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.177]) by mta01.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8358A1210DB for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:55:47 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:55:47 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: roll < roll@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1775590041.43590.1363841747387.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20130320160538.22616.92349.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [99.20.249.193]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.15_GA_2995 (ZimbraWebClient - [unknown] (Win)/6.0.15_GA_2995)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Subject: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 04:55:58 -0000

Hi all

Besides a number of editorial changes, the new version (-17) has the following key changes over the previous version:

1) The data option has been removed.
2) Only options allowed in a P2P mode DIO are: P2P-RDO, the dodag configuration option, the target option, the metric container options, the route information option. Any other option (in particular a prefix information option) found inside a P2P mode DIO will be ignored.
3) Suggested rules for RPLInstanceID reuse (Section 6.1).
4) Included the requirement that addresses in the TargetAddr and Address vector fields inside a P2P-RDO MUST be global or unique local (section 7).
5) Clarified that it is not possible to solicit P2P mode DIOs using DIS messages (Section 9.1)
6) Added a new section "Secure P2P RPL Operation". The basic requirement is that all routers participating in a secure P2P-RPL route discovery MUST follow the same Security Configuration (<T, Algorithm, KIM, LVL> tuple) as the Origin. Also disallowed the use of per-pair keys for a P2P-RPL route discovery.
7) Updated the "Security Considerations" section in view of the new "Secure P2P RPL Operation" section.

Thanks
Mukul


----- Forwarded Message -----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:05:38 AM
Subject: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : Reactive Discovery of Point-to-Point Routes in Low Power and Lossy Networks
	Author(s)       : Mukul Goyal
                          Emmanuel Baccelli
                          Matthias Philipp
                          Anders Brandt
                          Jerald Martocci
	Filename        : draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt
	Pages           : 39
	Date            : 2013-03-20

Abstract:
   This document specifies a point-to-point route discovery mechanism,
   complementary to the RPL core functionality.  This mechanism allows
   an IPv6 router to discover "on demand" routes to one or more IPv6
   routers in the LLN such that the discovered routes meet specified
   metrics constraints.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll