[Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Multicast: Forward selec - BIER CCAST - MPL YANG"

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Fri, 29 July 2016 07:23 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E149B12D099 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IIAbSp4culX3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F0FF12B04C for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.213]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id QXPf1t0054bqPqS01XPfdN; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:23:39 +0200
Received: from 2001:983:a264:1:f145:e579:90df:b2a by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:23:39 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:23:39 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Roll <roll@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Message-ID: <1071131a33c924ddca105e42ae68313b@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (afLbg2BTk5yt0ixDjT+gQjAhjAjJV3mo)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/W1HhfT91UZbmcWGKsUVssnemFDM>
Subject: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Multicast: Forward selec - BIER CCAST - MPL YANG"
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 07:23:44 -0000

Hi all,

Following the ROLL Meeting at IETF 96, we would like to know your
opinion about the drafts, presented during IETF95 and IETF96. This is
the second of three messages. The adoption of drafts as WG drafts
will be asked independently dependent on the status of the draft.


C: draft-vanderstok-roll-mpl-forw-select-00
      MPL Forwarder Select (MPLFS)

•    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
•    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
•    Are you willing to review the draft ?
•    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?

D: draft-bergmann-bier-ccast
     Source-Routed Multicast for RPL -

•    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
•    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
•    Are you willing to review the draft ?
•    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?

E: draft-vanderstok-roll-mpl-yang-01
     A YANG model for Multicast Protocol for Low power and lossy Networks 
(MPL)

•    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
•    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
•    Are you willing to review the draft ?
•    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?



It would be nice to know the reasons why you agree or disagree with the 
drafts


Thank you very much,

Peter and Ines