Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-12: (with COMMENT)

Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> Tue, 28 July 2015 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <robert.cragie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5031A0197; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LO3HQbo6FH-o; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com (mail-lb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF6A91A0169; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbzr7 with SMTP id zr7so69476201lbb.1; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uonvIi/bkvd4kleA2VBRzHNnY5nWHqHcvkCrKiixdsE=; b=bBCvjoCrGo6wV2YirnbJhkfQto6ijCK833DNcozVLIH/9cdW/FTn1D1QxWAwPbdU6B W8jdUaYv0LfhO/wsdYhOypl/0IrZunPBd7TBSytTHMeExCoJ/dgB7BI25xtJrPoVvltX jIl4kErvHYzow7pX46UXCEMwWTlzze6d1O9UFFl4JTqy0a19vxK7/jzEyNEKbPQyZFEp UtViDQtI/lQWm9O3VmxWiMAubyjFePtc7mvp6VE6A1OLgbOkjN9K6zVIbL8XDvL9jOHd wx0wocJdKDclc9b4X/c1+I9ZZJbBfUbUUGp0Ato4+c10UuSqItwmSx11RARvreyBykfK Y1vg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.63.137 with SMTP id g9mr31271042lbs.121.1438071536125; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: robert.cragie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.31.75 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150725140840.20611.18415.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20150725140840.20611.18415.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:18:56 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: pkhsgny5HDrUpFByNOmvGd9Otzg
Message-ID: <CADrU+dK44Gze4k5LKDK-_8HT2n-_=WMOMczk_XyPYOYGybyq2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133d004128cd3051beb1fe6
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/YmUjsb4_f2udEfxRaiLe2mG5eLs>
Cc: roll-chairs@ietf.org, "roll@ietf.org WG" <roll@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.ad@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building@ietf.org, Yvonne-Anne Pignolet <yvonneanne.pignolet@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:19:00 -0000

Hi Stephen,

Please see inline for specific responses.

Regarding the old comments: We have tried to respond to these issues in
previous follow up e-mails and modify the document in accordance with the
responses. Repeating these old comments suggests that neither those
responses nor the updated text have been read yet. Please can you read the
responses and updated text before simply repeating these comments?
Otherwise I can't see how we can make any progress on this.

Robert


On 25 July 2015 at 15:08, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; wrote:

> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Thanks for the discussion about security. I didn't check
> if the comments below were handled in -12, happy to
> chat about that if you want.
>
> First two comments are about text that's new in -11:
>
> - 4.1.8: "MUST be present" is ambiguous - do you mean
> it must be used? I think you do.
>

<RCC>This has been changed to "MUST be used on all nodes" in -12</RCC>


>
> - 4.1.8: "MUST be distributed or established in a
> secure fashion" isn't really a protocol requirement.
> Do you really just mean "see 4.1.8.1" ?
>

<RCC>As mentioned before, this is just introductory. I suggest removing the
sentence to close the comment.</RCC>