Re: [Roll] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25: (with COMMENT)
Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Fri, 17 May 2019 09:04 UTC
Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB10E120047; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6u6rapx0ILtc; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12d.google.com (mail-it1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E2EC12007C; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id q132so10746578itc.5; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dWVYAcI5h1Qe8AMCQxoeNoJC6tPt3cH7v8S3ttKEVFw=; b=a/5E5g6XkTky3BKs0X2huNpz/G+f9FKYOYk9qGz9f51l7OarOMA5JXdNRf86GqpQP0 qvpJB+BoNC3InvO+U7wUUhSnjr2cNQ0yUM/EI621ZqS9ya0AUp9koCahHNeKDyXty5p2 sBJeape4O5ozwvY7IJ9ePXiPbggNp2XYAF2PGt25DLeD6qmJ3PN6H+2o/PIEqywxXqSp ykd3Tx7OZRvcrkhzByHxFghuELicLfQthVnZRhKR+BhgaKyknM2DziEnH51wZlZJsM73 flmHpV0JxbHT+chEXUM3OrivBDxojjtokxgmRwh2HNCFuZ+fvWKWzWBRFcrtyPd2pZro VZ+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dWVYAcI5h1Qe8AMCQxoeNoJC6tPt3cH7v8S3ttKEVFw=; b=dG8vFyx/1w3vrYmAYm4iHikzDVQOKSLZqz5PxoBirfWws1bGrMePUHSy4pCZ618GBK yM0IysCAGAniU8N9MqJ+yKje6Bt0pl6LFi5al7KFaXOrKBaGvtE4oM77C/8dnpKmwEWa HeXjBekVgiD+lP/ICR2LP4bNDXemjmmOwkbgE6MPXmOF1h4ACJVF/6Y+BDDphzCPbADJ Qcuf1TQDbTxeauxnpQUT0Kq95USScXy7YLeGFxswQYu4ViscIFxqalQ5N1YgnUG4HaXQ iREnvZ4szxBuYdYKtAtNvaB9Q7ocTDqXpOvfJop7+byAS0eObZKwuFBEfGzyC1zQHIG9 t8Mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW2jFrxZoMV2M3MujmAoyLznvp/VTuP4EpA2U4ARMkPReZaA+6p 0c3lBM2Z0ZOe2Pla8MCLomDTpbECOYAfdwhjv30=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyD+AtvAD+A2iTOjRtt7YiPuU979W1QLoXIOiOaOt3El0lFTnnAk/p6k5yI8rD4EO1gtQk0dKcSTjRxTWEUGrM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:6a9:: with SMTP id d9mr1382673jad.21.1558083889765; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155665035621.7536.208543956693234352.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAP+sJUfAuWo6XQOR+qRHKGOBcswEZ2WqW3zva4AgE=rKucD6yg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUfAuWo6XQOR+qRHKGOBcswEZ2WqW3zva4AgE=rKucD6yg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 12:04:38 +0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUdYN-F7Q85Py8fg+C2BccvwZgDGf+eQsY5Owbcq2KSOSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: warren@kumari.net
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo@ietf.org, Peter Van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, roll-chairs <roll-chairs@ietf.org>, roll <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c79fc3058911ac01"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/bvNWQSTBv8xpxR3CqgjfW-Qd2GE>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-25: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 09:04:52 -0000
Hi Warren, Thank you for your review. We have addressed the Roman's discuss and we have added clarification about IPsec in the new version. Best regards, Ines, Michael and Pascal > Warren KumariNo Objection >> Comment (2019-05-01 for -25) >> >> I strongly support Roman's DISCUSS - the scaling *seems* like it would end poorly, and I'm a bit confused about what exactly is being recommended. >> I'm not 100% sure I understand how the deployment will actually occur, and so perhaps the IPSEC scaling doesn't cause an issue? >> >> >> >>
- [Roll] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf… Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
- Re: [Roll] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-… Ines Robles
- Re: [Roll] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-… Ines Robles