IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Following up on seq Counter to protect the config option and others

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 16 October 2019 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA20120926 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.436
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DOHoWivyAnzf for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392E61208DC for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:64:42:5650:5f0a:e07a:7e5f]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4969D1F455 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:47:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 78301E8B; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:48:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <MN2PR11MB3565FFC5F9C48EC4E7CAD65DD8900@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB3565FFC5F9C48EC4E7CAD65DD8900@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> message dated "Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:56:23 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:48:28 +0200
Message-ID: <21950.1571230108@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/cEmDZ7fct6RcZWR5D82Kgmx7woE>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Following up on seq Counter to protect the config option and others
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:47:39 -0000

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > At the interim today we refined the idea of a Sequence counter in a DIO
    > that increments when there is a change in a global option. 
    > For the lack of an acronym that results in SEAL, I'm using the RPL
    > Configuration State Sequence (RCSS) for now.
    
I came up with:

  Special Elided Attribute Lollipop = SEAL.
or
  Sequence of Elided Attributes Lollipop = SEAL.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email