[Roll] Route projection
"Turner, Randy" <Randy.Turner@landisgyr.com> Thu, 02 May 2019 10:16 UTC
Return-Path: <Randy.Turner@landisgyr.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0985112032D for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2019 03:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=landisgyr.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XFK1izyheu2C for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2019 03:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr80109.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.8.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2490512009C for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2019 03:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=landisgyr.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZjopDj3jFvsgyBYWSglru0nYuUXzYlOuSmBLuIr0tRE=; b=GoYVelWKXLpSFXxny4yejDtiOssC29uNd7h0hoGDDAbP/nIReqQadhNr/WKcUNHcuPyraY8f8wJmY15vFIA8B1famdUjOZB5vohpC6Bgctw0JBPfBG2xWLrb31Ec2fRQufVGwmHH9gKhhaFFo2p6Wdh1dVmEii87TDisnB4rBrM=
Received: from DB6PR0101MB2295.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.168.52.134) by DB6PR0101MB2472.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.169.221.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1835.13; Thu, 2 May 2019 10:16:28 +0000
Received: from DB6PR0101MB2295.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::2d4b:d16f:dee7:64a7]) by DB6PR0101MB2295.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::2d4b:d16f:dee7:64a7%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1835.018; Thu, 2 May 2019 10:16:28 +0000
From: "Turner, Randy" <Randy.Turner@landisgyr.com>
To: "'roll@ietf.org'" <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Route projection
Thread-Index: AdUAzVyQC380xs+rSA66vWPwbLYBSA==
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 10:16:27 +0000
Message-ID: <DB6PR0101MB2295A0C551482E3C7A7E7B9080340@DB6PR0101MB2295.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Randy.Turner@landisgyr.com;
x-originating-ip: [2601:c6:c780:1e1d:3892:986c:4a5f:edcf]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 89acd077-459a-4c90-63c2-08d6cee73d5d
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DB6PR0101MB2472;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB6PR0101MB2472:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB6PR0101MB24724BF36CBAEA06DD3AB6E080340@DB6PR0101MB2472.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0025434D2D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(136003)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(199004)(53754006)(189003)(4744005)(6916009)(86362001)(316002)(256004)(68736007)(5660300002)(99286004)(7696005)(52536014)(81166006)(6436002)(71200400001)(14454004)(53936002)(8676002)(7116003)(81156014)(66574012)(71190400001)(7736002)(186003)(3480700005)(221733001)(73956011)(66556008)(46003)(25786009)(74316002)(33656002)(478600001)(54896002)(790700001)(102836004)(6506007)(6306002)(66446008)(72206003)(9686003)(486006)(55016002)(66946007)(476003)(64756008)(6116002)(8936002)(76116006)(2906002)(66476007)(491001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB6PR0101MB2472; H:DB6PR0101MB2295.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: landisgyr.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: J6c3GiYfROxkaoIhSIMHmrV4QUEdZ7j5gpGZcLXwAyJH2ygDlWCRKJ3ORKFNMT8hKpFcHBkqjCMd9gaZG2PY3rT/FE/fuL2yi17qZ1KyOpRLKqtmNSiINUrAXWq1A6ROKLm9bW8RvyrG1ntnU74CZ82GrEjhPr4d3duOZhsrTPhJKAcJ3wNC+RssQhhZ/pIhdz4QWotZyPN7hNVeX+heRwaGwyVR2LsNZ2pUQOy7uhMpyDrELXxJp9bislHm1J44iQWfkoQ1SQQUHTu0MoAKJEhJtZKKX2G84CfKYVQyBeHqM3POYhazB86yRzttDI17ynJDzfFBkFURG8RIMn+5ZMRIBiFaKoSrirVSWZfiW0eYMKH4JLIL2O+A1MHbURMtZrtQSYdtJ8drWnzuysWll+YwtX52TKch6CwbDnWIREg=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB6PR0101MB2295A0C551482E3C7A7E7B9080340DB6PR0101MB2295_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: landisgyr.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 89acd077-459a-4c90-63c2-08d6cee73d5d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 May 2019 10:16:27.9980 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: ee2cd48b-958f-4be4-9852-b8f104c001b9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB6PR0101MB2472
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/fvIIAdokLkfhNigcbksOwRUhNgg>
Subject: [Roll] Route projection
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 10:16:34 -0000
HI All, Apologies if this has already been discussed, but in reading the draft on route projection, it seems like the PCE is always making decisions when routes are projected and I understand why this is the focus. Has there been a discussion on the possibility of an arbitrary router in the DODAG "asking" the root or PCE for an optimal source route (P2P) to a particular destination ? Or in the language of the draft, an arbitrary router requesting a P-DAO to a particular destination (assuming the "request" for a P-DAO contains the intended destination). I guess I'm more interested in the "non-storing" scenario for route projection. Thanks! R.
- [Roll] Route projection Turner, Randy
- Re: [Roll] Route projection Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] Route projection Turner, Randy
- Re: [Roll] Route projection Turner, Randy