[Roll] draft-ietf-roll-security-framework returned to working group.

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 10 August 2012 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EBC21F8644 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.476
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eFqz59t4cm3h for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA1521F84DA for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7AEU5Gu030781; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:30:05 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7AEU3q8030758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:30:04 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: roll@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:30:01 +0100
Message-ID: <063101cd7704$a0ed4050$e2c7c0f0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac13BJ0clmxkTXN2Sy20seRREG3wlg==
Content-Language: en-gb
Cc: draft-ietf-roll-security-framework@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] draft-ietf-roll-security-framework returned to working group.
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:30:07 -0000

This document has sat in IESG Evaluation::AD Followup for 467 days.

The blocking issue has been that the document does not actually provide any
security guidelines or mechanisms, and RPL itself (RFC 6550) is also sadly
lacking.

Michael Richardson and I sat down with Stephen Farrell (Security AD) and cooked
up a plan to generate some useful security documents for RPL. Inevitably this
will introduce more delay, but at least there is a plan that we might manage to
execute. Michael has introduced the plan to the WG and there seems to be
support.

Part of this plan involves pulling draft-ietf-roll-security-framework back from
the IESG, returning it to the WG, and re-casting it as a threat analysis
(something it does quite well at the moment).

Thus, this document is returned to the working group for further work.

Thanks,
Adrian