IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] DAO Projection

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 13 March 2017 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AAF129AC4; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0_5Un66FXUuk; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B37E9129406; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E63E234; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:02:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E9E6381A; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:39:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4b303d06ef2f472f9c934fc17ac73b28@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <CAO0Djp0VmJsb=tf6U97ndSLyRfjU99rBZR5axxuxLWOUbqTZMQ@mail.gmail.com> <dd356759713b429b8ab5a749acf11001@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <c1c83e50f843485cbd2b5f73db792efc@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <4b303d06ef2f472f9c934fc17ac73b28@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:39:24 -0400
Message-ID: <11504.1489433964@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/oZqZFQBzzbjoVhknLep6oWrn84g>
Cc: "draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] DAO Projection
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:39:28 -0000

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > 3) At the moment, the draft allows to mix any form of P-DAO (Storing vs
    > non storing) with any mode of RPL. We need to discuss if that flies or
    > not.

If this permits the root to learn which nodes support P-DAO, and networks can
do incremental upgrades, that's a win to me.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email