IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] London

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Sun, 12 January 2014 07:39 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557F61ADF51 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:39:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sVcO_VTI8EuA for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:39:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx11.netapp.com (mx11.netapp.com [216.240.18.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E1B1ADBD2 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:39:56 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,646,1384329600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="95581556"
Received: from vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) by mx11-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2014 23:39:45 -0800
Received: from SACEXCMBX06-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.9.60]) by vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:39:47 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Heiner Hummel <heinerhummel@aol.com>
Thread-Topic: [rrg] London
Thread-Index: AQHPDRsNFL/rnM9bbk2HL3xGGHUfQZqAgjIAgAC8nQA=
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 07:39:45 +0000
Message-ID: <5BB75319-9204-41F1-B869-8D6F77E39190@netapp.com>
References: <E371C7FE-F5F1-459A-93E6-6C0A5C008630@tony.li> <69AE8596-8E77-4CC9-B7DA-5F0105D8E6E9@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <69AE8596-8E77-4CC9-B7DA-5F0105D8E6E9@aol.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.118]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F1D29358-B4FD-4827-A499-EEFED565E068"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IRTF Routing RG <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] London
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 07:39:58 -0000

Hi,

On 2014-1-11, at 21:24, Heiner Hummel <heinerhummel@aol.com> wrote:
> Given that the IESG doesn't care about IPv4 anymore

so even if that were true, what the IESG cares for should have little impact on what an IRTF research group is looking into.

I thought Tony's email was spot-on. If the RRG wants to remain chartered, it needs to become active again and identify some topics that it wants to investigate. Looking at what's been published by academics in the recent past seems a useful exercise in order to find some of those topics.

And the group needs a core set of participants that are willing to put in the energy to make some successful meetings happen, by re-energizing the broader routing community and by inviting folks that have interesting things to present to show up to do so.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email