Re: [rtcweb] AD review: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Fri, 02 November 2018 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70266130DF5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WDZaxhSR1jqL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12f.google.com (mail-it1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6FD130DEC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id p64-v6so4002992itp.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 09:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=q+4m8zCcuimfsWd9IJVijt4aTLUslMst0nY/lTMdB8M=; b=BorqrXLfsrxPL/b8CgFkUDJy1DT2aauD9FweQHIjW8ooGJmIyx21GHR02O1e/KFEqm gXQpDjJsN0fImDwdGv3J166+OjDg50NvtXoAjnl+BBdaWscD2dQsmMvkeyx4Qaub16HM aSxganLkn7Qx+IWyxu32mg13ewE+Gqi9Y9Wq0hBIICFtKIYU9+QraTSM7N0tc3mH7BMN UELbv6dAIRwWRhAxc9tRmkybUTpQimng3DU0by66RALHmVlf6iBhddctZCYLkoBZCbMG dheBGCK84pMZKJGrgQxirjbXCIqzwEn3lBxg2IHEZXobx3p4Sf+8wEfZiZebRsrXN15P XioA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=q+4m8zCcuimfsWd9IJVijt4aTLUslMst0nY/lTMdB8M=; b=DKXeIImCnP0VPnsx7J3CnbvxLf+qg5JBFgQ5IAX1zgY5dTgvNQpCyfp8KAnV188alN VXwQnuxo2yM/mYtW9ZQuZQN4YX7X4YblgnRSK64cIEjZOb2SXu74IvH/QVo97EwcOF7t xehZ0i39E/JcWfvjZWQPhV2oTHwDOoLZdmYkNmWvQPkM5xBOhtKpXkmwq8qeklgZqS0q 7V0Q4QT/HzdD1knVFaynWwZEaTIR7Z1F/43qMzN1TSGWtUQ5I2oJPQI412x3gyhbLQF1 6GEHDcyfITyET6iAa4MM9fVy7Fuf2DoIrL9CPLZ7wJcFNZgMeGHuoys827EyKmiLTosp Izwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJfdZLQog4bZ2NO+tYVl1UO+tRFJ5WnrUJgs9W0+YNIBC/q/djw Dp/8Vcj5zkj1251KiFoCYQjXiFbBGDQzpK9g5Zt5ng==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dG1VhrD+r/PyEvvkglwK0fykaTipE10FnGP3uefo9iKbSezOYfnIs1ult2KbbJ5JB+FijutgBtghou6wJ2WvI=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:fac2:: with SMTP id v185-v6mr357693ith.153.1541176561831; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 09:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <773c8e91-a1d2-8c9e-fd19-c8b181f6dad1@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <773c8e91-a1d2-8c9e-fd19-c8b181f6dad1@nostrum.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:35:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0k1v5gLduSy3Z_xf-Cmu7PR=QWvUMjugPi3p5HrtL2pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling.all@ietf.org, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000081aa050579b121fa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/5xzQ7n9Tcqc8_G_rbtgO9Zjt3aU>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] AD review: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 16:36:06 -0000

See https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/ip-handling/pull/1

Will send out a new version of the doc when the upload tool reopens.

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:15 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>; wrote:

> This is my AD review for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling.
>
> I think this document is ready to go into IETF last call, modulo the ICE
> citation issue. I plan to issue last call for this document at the same
> time
> as draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch and draft-ietf-rtcweb-security, so it
> will
> wait for those to become ready.
>
> I'm marking the document as "revised ID needed" pending the ICE reference
> update.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [DISCUSS]
>
> Per the discussion around Cluster 238 dependencies, please reference RFC
> 8445
> instead of RFC 5245.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> §2:
>
> Please update to match the RFC 8174 boilerplate.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> §5.2:
>
>  >  Future versions of this document may define additional modes and/or
>  >  update the recommended default modes.
>
> Suggest: "Future documents may...", as future consensus may be to update
> rather
> than replace this document.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>