IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] AD review: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Sat, 03 November 2018 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E49126CB6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 10:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cE5sN62PeJCz for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 10:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x133.google.com (mail-it1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86F58123FFD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 10:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x133.google.com with SMTP id d6so7384447itl.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Nov 2018 10:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=llBPw8ltOInVYQH3mk4TS5iqlsbF3dpgVvaCfG2Ue8k=; b=pLnxYIyYw7aFz/JYBCp51AEXfICoGyIfPzT5L7uogJ8W5LMz3vDnnDh4Cu1N0bR3aj R1KsFWImWJLWtDEAp8ODiiPDDCwIVdemy/eggZTQhE1z1OU3s3O5R5FO3R1i48osz98U LbLQ8aBKMpRh9q0PgMKID53bo4lNsfg8i9Z9QbKDGcp/YFaydc0m0NT+wp97p3Db1J3e 8JjwoQkbOathv6dpfo6qnqiK2+6jKi9+fwsQK3i/yaVmOS8UCIK0SymivPYzMm23bHRe GFnUbTllw4oTMXW7cw1eb5D/yxdiZwC695XDQfqI9M9f1OrVYXYnT1dAQE3C2wcnOrsb SVSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=llBPw8ltOInVYQH3mk4TS5iqlsbF3dpgVvaCfG2Ue8k=; b=LC0X2N/6euVvjrj8vNfVtD4jPuXcF+Q+t3pftrHJ0pFFdzJH+cx/vB9AgMykn4lHd3 bzbJH2cptUi/TKwHJyz2alnLNZJMCgZMysJ+6HrM3XbGnSVxUKWjzY4nFPijjtUn8U88 cxEm4a5N1W/hhzKlb+OaojxNmbyI+MSZMxZ5aTaCZM35Jj4iklMrty79bv+5RuVWB9z0 zGghVj73XMmcv9qJDLMYj59gxf8kSPVO22tjiIrzOSf1+aV7NA+u9g/BcA6mc22bUJiA Vomg7Bxp0uhKf0udL2P7ZQ0rm7zNpaZT31IkQCmMZ71p9VWbKvxmd9pOfT56F83dDMKX JOtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKwQLlnYJKuot8fuxLy4INRHkGvIElfQwXgokVx22zD0mDSaMZR xpsvJ5qSss4ZsRsc1Z8zi5Tr+O+6N6yh4twH0yU+s9vyf66rQA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5duoSrgre86+fMwfICOmpXDGKVn10KMOkJMm6HYGWqBcZVjzDfVJxEZGXDxCSaZz0WRj+40V0A95rO6CAXC2KE=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:966e:: with SMTP id c101-v6mr2045629jai.58.1541265904417; Sat, 03 Nov 2018 10:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <773c8e91-a1d2-8c9e-fd19-c8b181f6dad1@nostrum.com> <CAOJ7v-0k1v5gLduSy3Z_xf-Cmu7PR=QWvUMjugPi3p5HrtL2pw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-0k1v5gLduSy3Z_xf-Cmu7PR=QWvUMjugPi3p5HrtL2pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 10:24:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1tZuniuTwk+573r_wxmzfssJihUEyNL8QGwMR6f4U3hQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling.all@ietf.org, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bd3f630579c5ee4c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Q7maMh18FI8DjlUSx3iRz9pFESk>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] AD review: draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 17:25:09 -0000

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling-11

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:35 AM Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> See https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/ip-handling/pull/1
>
> Will send out a new version of the doc when the upload tool reopens.
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:15 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>
>> This is my AD review for draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling.
>>
>> I think this document is ready to go into IETF last call, modulo the ICE
>> citation issue. I plan to issue last call for this document at the same
>> time
>> as draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch and draft-ietf-rtcweb-security, so it
>> will
>> wait for those to become ready.
>>
>> I'm marking the document as "revised ID needed" pending the ICE reference
>> update.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> [DISCUSS]
>>
>> Per the discussion around Cluster 238 dependencies, please reference RFC
>> 8445
>> instead of RFC 5245.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> §2:
>>
>> Please update to match the RFC 8174 boilerplate.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> §5.2:
>>
>>  >  Future versions of this document may define additional modes and/or
>>  >  update the recommended default modes.
>>
>> Suggest: "Future documents may...", as future consensus may be to update
>> rather
>> than replace this document.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email