Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling in WebRTC
Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Tue, 21 April 2015 22:58 UTC
Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB69B1B2DFB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1KKL9QT9fGv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7FDE1B2DFF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netb.Speedport_W_723V_1_36_000 ([84.189.12.53]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lyj4F-1ZMiuy2HNn-0164lA; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:58:51 +0200
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:58:54 +0200
Message-ID: <hnkdja9eed0i26diofvla5gisddd1jflf8@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <CAOJ7v-1BQ3cVBQy=DA0eKPkcQ0BP2Ga1t2nxi9uB_Yzs51GAvg@mail.gmail.com> <55352067.6070007@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnW=piduWd+L19AHd1u90=ryTXqoAJ1iNdw+cCY9WdLYNQ@mail.gmail.com> <5535496C.4000809@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnVi6iup71Qo6u3XjAA-q30itLjMK=Ao7xQQm63ZSNdKag@mail.gmail.com> <553568AE.3040706@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnW1V5q6DxbSNiPHrchi_5PHKB7GT6EU=5-1krg+osFLQg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW1V5q6DxbSNiPHrchi_5PHKB7GT6EU=5-1krg+osFLQg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hbWGWN9omNBtHqDEsTWSFHIhjXuZyxG1dxpjXs62Tyi2ZO05V0w i7SwQR3qbvCQaqUiIkAPOsa9OMfC/77z1SxeKklpkYOc1lzJhqm9v5a+UzFlsTMtDyNnyqU MeEvI3QDwHo8g30kit+z/KIqPbr7qSibQ/0kh93LEVCIyOll2Zs+4EzAwqZduOFGzB4vTFq ozFDotjBJ1dA1+7HAPQ1g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/RXekZYuG5CiAWCS_2ZG3D6iFeRQ>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling in WebRTC
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 22:58:56 -0000
* Martin Thomson wrote: >Sorry, I thought this was well understood. > >First party: what you see in the funny bar at the top that no one pays >attention to >Third party: those that provide the images you see If being "first party" comes with any sort of potential commercial ad- vantage, you can be sure that plenty of people will argue their stuff is first party stuff, regardless how ridiculous the argument may be. See e.g. W3C's "Tracking Protection" list archives. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
- [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling in … Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Simon Perreault
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Kaiduan Xie
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Philipp Hancke
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Simon Perreault
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… carlo von lynX
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Martin Thomson
- [rtcweb] Effectiveness of first-party vs third-pa… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] New proposal for IP address handling… Cullen Jennings
- [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network acc… carlo von lynX
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Daniel Roesler
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… carlo von lynX
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… carlo von lynX
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Randell Jesup
- [rtcweb] Dreaming of serverless P2P over the web carlo von lynX
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Tim Panton new
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… carlo von lynX
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Daniel Roesler
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Göran Eriksson AP
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… carlo von lynX
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… carlo von lynX
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Philipp Hancke
- Re: [rtcweb] Prompt for mic, camera *and* network… Philipp Hancke