[rtcweb] Nit in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-05
"Parthasarathi R" <partha@parthasarathi.co.in> Fri, 19 July 2013 20:02 UTC
Return-Path: <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256DC21E8091 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.930, BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H6ZagTZ19VD4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mailhostbox.com (outbound-us2.mailhostbox.com [70.87.28.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A41411E80F4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userPC (unknown [122.178.223.33]) (Authenticated sender: partha@parthasarathi.co.in) by smtp.mailhostbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A9BBF6381B0; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:02:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parthasarathi.co.in; s=20120823; t=1374264127; bh=WHdCN4cMCh1sYaXFwE5PyesHyFCQjD2cU9WrZSe1Ees=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PWNtMCLE4NcGbE/7duaQzlZE2pg8Z5DJPCElUcjjNSRUcViJGluvasKnnyjKxlZ9w qJW9EGBsJP0P/ghjnm5qQFsfXQ8jHpzI6K9xKsFk9CuLxqozatNIAIPuTRT4SGo8dn o6tr0mmHiu2Qi05RxMurxY7nX66/ATgW2xUduUsA=
From: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
To: 'Eric Rescorla' <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 01:31:47 +0530
Message-ID: <016c01ce84ba$d01edc70$705c9550$@co.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac6EusyxVasepmDlRxWaq8IsRz+L+w==
Content-Language: en-us
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0C0209.51E99B3F.0010, ss=2, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=2, cld=1, fgs=64
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Suspect
X-CTCH-Score: 0.000
X-CTCH-Rules:
X-CTCH-Flags: 64
X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000
X-CTCH-SenderID: partha@parthasarathi.co.in
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalMessages: 1
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSpam: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSuspected: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalBulk: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalConfirmed: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalRecipients: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalVirus: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-BlueWhiteFlag: 0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 70.87.28.142
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Nit in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-05
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:02:18 -0000
Hi Eric, Sec 4.2.2 of draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-05 has the following statement twice: "Once consent is verified, there still is some concern about misinterpretation attacks as described by Huang et al.[huang-w2sp]." Regards Partha
- [rtcweb] Nit in draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-05 Parthasarathi R