[rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-12

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Sat, 30 September 2017 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4FF124B18 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IFM_13YmaKM0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E6A2134231 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id k4so2370932wmc.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wH45wiHjn5gmAOpzkxlN6u5ZdaUoAsWfL7EbMtOOqPc=; b=AQFv3RgD3jE0IimwY2/RXa+OgXzfLljFDSvqeXYjRmfY4LqgqSpfH53jiO7ToX6uBm 1H90/wq5Uos2XzDML3YZNyzfXQRi3v53eLr5R7QGTO6SatqliBPQBUtLvPrKh0A1+aA8 Cc9UKavtrNmuivA9lsRZet97KOr8pIXjNfBV2Ik16jBjafB8ebXpRpClZqTfKnt3IY6Q k2pwHevnFzFDiSQVTZjF5BchCOrrBDmzGmz3QaGYZBcE+jINJp6+VKNTGBEORChzM6Er POPf/29MVnSnfmbrvunMZn7qvAiRBNuUlQia1QJUAKx/b+3o8YFlzlt9BrjY39E2dacR JoOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wH45wiHjn5gmAOpzkxlN6u5ZdaUoAsWfL7EbMtOOqPc=; b=VC79FsQZj4mJutQ+4DZj1UOpDykLQz6WlmpaEtt+Ha/6LpAi154o/yRRVjjTt9lqFq GryXvLC5zFdb2XPPhPpUw6CBi1R3bT0o58BqfsVHdqjdcBHIA/1/x4SmKMrvFWdeoYMu rPlk3LwH4RPAOzs3dUXQHvnMvLvPLTwN0NV9B2RnmUdIIGTDIj3tG3VQb3YohPufDY2g Eyw9IR0n3kdDCIEbZyMCFog5guUTXfKmZIOqePmEykF+CYP+rX7eBBSdqkxBT76Gyn4V 4E9YdWQLqq8uPU2r3XVc1yVEFOBmZao2k6nC5xJX2jaGPKG9vzfHDJljXh/x1ShQNeqf bDrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiGL+vKd995k+qdieqrA2EotHKIDgGyBNyDuzFLh2izq1p5kp5S 8UYm2UlzEjUjsoIW7GxtbF25bQJC+HFWmfTFdqzphrU6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBy5m1hdfoKLQor7r6oS0XcBWdkwsrdANeRCxv592ZpowXvLC/4ROy2LKfmg9h8mS4S9hOGdWZeiWOPC5OxLWU=
X-Received: by 10.28.9.130 with SMTP id 124mr5972362wmj.65.1506805636407; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:07:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUH2E1pfh7156Fktv39tGqcAo_wbOBkyA7JKUjMs19SFaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114420f6b4e58e055a6e8698"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/uamfE21xIG_Ve3SGISXsEkl8ilU>
Subject: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-12
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:07:20 -0000

FYI, in the ICE WG we've just begun the WGLC for
draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-12. It will be 3 weeks and end on Oct 21, 2017
(not 2018 :).  Please direct review comments to the ICE WG mailing list.

If possible, we would like a dedicated reviewer from rtcweb to perform a
"consistent check in depth" with the rtcweb documents.   If you're willing
to be that dedicate reviewer, please let me know.