Re:IETF-106 agenda?

<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn> Mon, 11 November 2019 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9EA12020A for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 22:50:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_48uZySwxcr for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 22:50:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C637312013D for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 22:50:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.164.215]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 14DFECDDFB98988407EC for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:50:35 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 026B31F74AF5228C83B2; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:50:35 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp05.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.204]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id xAB6mlUe003806; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:48:47 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:48:47 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:48:47 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa5dc9044f59d9d221
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <201911111448470627265@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20191109193200.GD19227@pfrc.org>
References: 20191101181535.GA10713@pfrc.org,20191109193200.GD19227@pfrc.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
To: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, <rrahman@cisco.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6SUVURi0xMDYgYWdlbmRhPw==?=
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn xAB6mlUe003806
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/Xi-NuFRecSmd7xkGNaHOYKVV0rY>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:50:41 -0000

Hi Jeff,






I could be one minutes taker if no others experienced volunteered.







Best Regards,


Xiao Min









原始邮件



发件人:JeffreyHaas <jhaas@pfrc.org>;
收件人:rtg-bfd@ietf.org <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>;;
抄送人:Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com>;;
日 期 :2019年11月10日 03:28
主 题 :Re: IETF-106 agenda?




Working Group,

We will be attempting to meet at IETF-106.  There's just enough business to
discuss to warrant using our time slot.

Note as below: We do not currently have a minutes taker.  If we do not have
one (ideally volunteering ahead of time) by meeting start time, we will
suspend without a meeting.

The authors of BFD for vxlan are requested to prepare slides covering
changes since the last IETF and a summary of the rather energetic discussion
we've had since that meeting.  Additionally, please summarize the open
issues since we have a few still being discussed on the list.

Please recall that BFD is meeting on Tuesday.  Please send me your slides by
Sunday.

-----

Current targeted agenda:

Chairs update:
  5 mins - Jeff Haas

BFD for vxlan: 
  15 minutes - TBD

BFD for Large Packets:
  5 minutes - Jeff

BFD Demand Mode:
  10 minutes - Greg

Using One-Arm BFD in Cloud Network:
  10 minutes


-- Jeff


On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 02:15:35PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Working Group,
> 
> A session request had gone in for IETF 106 to accommodate the need for a
> possible session.  The agenda, to this point, had been left as an open
> question primarily to accommodate need to close on lingering questions in
> active work.  In particular, this was for two items:
> 
> - BFD for vxlan
> - BFD for Large Packets
> 
> (For transparency, I am an author on BFD for large packets)
> 
> As of this afternoon, we seem to have drafts submitted that cover the known
> open issues on both of these drafts.  In particular, the work to get us to
> the latest draft for the vxlan document took over 150 messages.
> 
> If BFD meets, agenda time was primarily reserved to reconcile open issues on
> these documents.
> 
> Discussion on BFDv2 is currently deferred for next IETF to focus the Working
> Group's limited attention on closing open work.
> 
> That said, if we have other topics to consider, please submit them for
> consideration.  If we have no such topics, and the discussion on the above
> two drafts seems likely to conclude well over e-mail, we may consider
> canceling the session.
> 
> As a final note, since Reshad is unable to make it to IETF-106, if we do
> decide to continue with our meeting, we will require the commitment for a
> minutes taker.  Reshad and I often will cover that for each other over the
> course of a session, but I won't be able to sustain that on my own.
> 
> -- Jeff, for the chairs.