Re: [RTG-DIR] [Lsr] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-17.txt

[Tomonori Takeda <[e-mail]>]

Hi Peter, Eric,

Thanks.
Proposed changes look good to me.

Tomonori


On 2018/11/14 22:59, Peter Psenak wrote:
> Hi Erik,
> 
> On 14/11/18 14:24 , Erik Auerswald wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> please see inline (I have kept just the relevant part):
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:13:37PM +0100, Peter Psenak wrote:
>>> On 14/11/18 12:49 , Tomonori Takeda wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> 1) Flooding Scope of SR-Algorithm TLV
>>>> In Section 4.1, it says:
>>>>
>>>>     "If the SR-Algorithm TLV appears in
>>>>      multiple OSPFv3 Router Information Opaque LSAs that have different
>>>>      flooding scopes, the SR-Algorithm TLV in the OSPFv3 Router
>>>>      Information Opaque LSA with the area-scoped flooding scope MUST be
>>>>      used."
>>>>
>>>> At the same time, it say:
>>>>
>>>>     "For the purpose of SR-Algorithm TLV advertisement, area-
>>>>      scoped flooding is REQUIRED."
>>>>
>>>> So, does it mean a) a router MUST use area-scoped flooding for sending,
>>>> and
>>>
>>> no. It says that that for the purpose of the SR-Algorithm TLV area 
>>> scope is
>>> required. That means it cannot be link-scope, but it can be
>>> autonomous-system scope, because that is also covering the area-scope.
>>
>> May I suggest to add the words "at least" to make the wording more
>> explicit?
>>
>>      "For the purpose of SR-Algorithm TLV advertisement, at least
>>       area-scoped flooding is REQUIRED."
> 
> sure, will do that.
> 
> thanks,
> Peter
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Erik
>> .
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Tomonori Takeda
NTT Network Service Systems Labs.
[phone]