[RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-08

Stig Venaas via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 30 September 2021 00:14 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stig Venaas via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, sfc@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <163296087839.13215.13678192950985129059@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:14:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/727VM2zYXKn-Us60_juXSedGA8o>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-08

Reviewer: Stig Venaas
Review result: Has Issues

Summary:
The document is easy to read and in a good shape.
I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should be resolved
before publication.

Comments:

The document is quite good and easy to read. My only concern is the security
considerations that are rather brief.

Major Issues:

No major issues found.

Minor Issues:

The Security considerations might need more details.
Are there any concerns about incorrect metadata? What are the consequences of
metadata being wrong intentionally, or by accident. When should integrity
protection be used?

[RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-s… Stig Venaas via Datatracker
Re: [RTG-DIR] [sfc] Rtgdir last call review of dr… wei.yuehua