Re: [RTG-DIR] RTG-DIR Telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Wed, 21 February 2018 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD138127077; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 05:17:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=eci365.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vGM96usAz6Vd; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 05:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com [85.158.142.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A98381270A3; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 05:17:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [85.158.142.193] (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) by server-3.bemta.az-b.eu-central-1.aws.symcld.net id C7/24-03119-3517D8A5; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:17:07 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrDJsWRWlGSWpSXmKPExsViougQqxtc2Bt lcGqhtMWNQxuYLFYcn8lsMWtWvMXdH3/ZLE7O+cFssWDNU3YHNo+ds+6yeyxZ8pPJ4+6tS0wB zFGsmXlJ+RUJrBlPX25mLtg0i7Fi85OlTA2MS2YwdjFycbAItDFLPHm7mRnEERKYwiRxec8uF gjnAaPEpf3HgMo4OdgEbCU2rb7LBmKLCBRJTGh+ywRSxCxwlVFi/tszrCAJYQEPicnfP7JDFH lKTD14ignCdpLYfKUByOYA2qcqsfxXIUiYVyBGYuerN1DLrjBKPJ27EGwOp0CgxKwp68HmMAq ISXw/tQZsDrOAuMStJ/PBbAkBAYkle84zQ9iiEi8f/2OFqE+SuP90ISNEXFFixr057BC2rMSl +d1gP0sIbGGS+LHxEFRCT2LrxLeMIMdJCChLbHkRC2H6SnSv5oIoB/rx9P/fUDO1JO78OgDVm i3RfmoeG4TdzShx7E80RMMMZom73xtZIBIyEpt2zmaCSGxgk3i+9zlYQkggWeLEnM8sExh1Zi F5DsLOk9jzcBr7LHAoCUqcnPmEZRbQUcwCmhLrd+lDlChKTOl+yA5ha0i0zpnLjiy+gJF9FaN FUlFmekZJbmJmjq6hgYGuoaGxrqmuuZFeYpVukl5qqW5yal5JUSJQUi+xvFivuDI3OSdFLy+1 ZBMjMN0xAMEOxr5DiYcYJTmYlER559v0RgnxJeWnVGYkFmfEF5XmpBYfYpTh4FCS4P2aD5QTL EpNT61Iy8wBJl6YtAQHj5II7weQNG9xQWJucWY6ROoUoz3Hlkcv25g5DoDJGy9eA8kty960MQ ux5OXnpUqJ84oVALUJgLRllObBDYVlikuMslLCvIxAZwrxFKQW5WaWoMq/YhTnYFQS5n0Lspw nM68EbvcroLOYgM66wAV2VkkiQkqqgdHiy9Y52pMk3tzqcMwIYO4S4776tUHtr5b7rqQjKyV9 yy8VHi80ipw2Ye8nWX3LT92pz9b/4OTz+3d+tnDcqa3vT7zZ+HyC2t+Mjj+XPDZvbuPd/FM/r sllzp3VPUuqf3+fX/dt3rvf30wkZ0WI/U0O//9Cw9tC7aNRSeRPxq1Nc/+U2rkzuDQosRRnJB pqMRcVJwIAgcZJtQ8EAAA=
X-Env-Sender: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-238.messagelabs.com!1519219023!1842260!1
X-Originating-IP: [52.33.64.93]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.4.45; banners=ecitele.com,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 25986 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2018 13:17:06 -0000
Received: from us-west-2b.mta.dlp.protect.symantec.com (HELO EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (52.33.64.93) by server-10.tower-238.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 21 Feb 2018 13:17:06 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ECI365.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ecitele-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=fmAD5pO/zC9QlRzV3xVZ1qxuOClsR8qJYw/T7bM1NK8=; b=a0eyb6/u75jrF0ZQX7cxO6MNDWWa3Db2Kcg1Nuhikw5uONoEor3twCDnX7iTo1JhX/zsHiKP9iN+D0P47K5fI5bp3km4VHz/7iCefQNvpjEe0YvT+oL70E8FT34sVynGv+isLsx82Km/B6z7n+oWWt6A/13wxN0yJJxwQFHAf4E=
Received: from AM2PR03MB0962.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.161.129.144) by AM2PR03MB0739.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.161.19.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.506.18; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:17:02 +0000
Received: from AM2PR03MB0962.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::902b:4634:bd47:f227]) by AM2PR03MB0962.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::902b:4634:bd47:f227%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0506.023; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:17:02 +0000
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay.all@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RTG-DIR Telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay
Thread-Index: AdOkuGiEML+eLKrlQ5Ol4wTRIHoKtgF688yAABwRMQAAAC3XEA==
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:17:02 +0000
Message-ID: <AM2PR03MB09623DA2C8C56CBF3D3743CE9DCE0@AM2PR03MB0962.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DB3PR03MB096972D1DF55006E50BECCA39DF50@DB3PR03MB0969.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <381B2074-0F2C-4FED-8F1B-245B7196A80A@nokia.com> <CAMMESswK-Lf6sy=65LeSv7EK5RmC1QRDiUcmwbeQFV0kmAEcAA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESswK-Lf6sy=65LeSv7EK5RmC1QRDiUcmwbeQFV0kmAEcAA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.234.241.1]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM2PR03MB0739; 7:7VYCuEd+cRmP9Nzw44m3WBc+psQTwId0aFOEZs6GX2LAdyGkq5AsYP1S7Cdx2EBTxOVEIhwW6iVmaaH+AmhO0A90FQB0buqohRybZ2S1OPowKi/wotTmSmS0U4rmuR2QbFhzBQ8R8Kena3j35i4yPALEM/C2ZZuBCWBwsUewI6doTzVyF7Yibz9sjhFwABsFCzRwOE/3VeACBb/nCcL6cbA4eVmWvqyCfJNDO3o3zJ3rq+aqArod82rpl85dQTfq
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5153fa84-2257-43d9-b1c9-08d5792d6544
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:AM2PR03MB0739;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM2PR03MB0739:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM2PR03MB0739E1EE0EB5B313AF40150C9DCE0@AM2PR03MB0739.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(82608151540597)(85827821059158)(21748063052155)(279101305709854)(21532816269658);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3231101)(944501161)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041288)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:AM2PR03MB0739; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM2PR03MB0739;
x-forefront-prvs: 0590BBCCBC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(39380400002)(346002)(366004)(189003)(252514010)(199004)(5890100001)(68736007)(6246003)(6306002)(99286004)(3280700002)(5250100002)(97736004)(102836004)(229853002)(6506007)(2906002)(25786009)(8656006)(53546011)(59450400001)(81156014)(8676002)(86362001)(81166006)(7696005)(76176011)(66066001)(54906003)(53936002)(316002)(3660700001)(110136005)(6116002)(236005)(790700001)(14454004)(7736002)(54896002)(478600001)(6436002)(9686003)(106356001)(3846002)(8936002)(606006)(2900100001)(2950100002)(33656002)(72206003)(55016002)(74316002)(39060400002)(105586002)(5660300001)(4326008)(186003)(26005)(19609705001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM2PR03MB0739; H:AM2PR03MB0962.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ecitele.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: sK478cKKJP6C0LjbF+HddtNkXpnp0XhytkviNKjmp4i+ggzisp0Pk1jMLHtKxiVnLjaZ62DIiLFcWmpcl0PcQgVTJ+uJjKKn0w9/ZpS/uBThwLFiXEIzlF2ueJiLwKqG9q41Ojun9kOF5+mTEh3whwYExedgbU+RToHptfRaAwU=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM2PR03MB09623DA2C8C56CBF3D3743CE9DCE0AM2PR03MB0962eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5153fa84-2257-43d9-b1c9-08d5792d6544
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Feb 2018 13:17:02.1345 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2c514a61-08de-4519-b4c0-921fef62c42a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM2PR03MB0739
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/7aHDhzC6CGhLOfV6Q2lcvcugUw8>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RTG-DIR Telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:17:12 -0000

Alvaro,
PWs as an a “virtual ES” are also used in conjunction with EVPN in the scenarios that are not directly related to DCI. One example (actually pointed to me by Jorge during the review process) is the EVPN Virtual Ethernet Segment<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-02> draft (now expired).

It is, of course, up to you to decide whether this justifies marking the draft I’ve reviewed as Updating RFC 7432 because it also defined PWs as a (virtual) ES for EVPN. Alternatively, it is possible to wait until the EVPN Virtual segment draft is resuscitated and progressed – but this can take quite some time...

Regards,
Sasha

Office: +972-39266302
Cell:      +972-549266302
Email:   Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com

From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 3:04 PM
To: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>;; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>;
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay.all@ietf.org; rtg-dir@ietf.org; rtg-ads@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RTG-DIR Telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay

Hi!

I see that the change below has already been made in -09.  However, I don’t think that an Update applies in this case.

In general, when Updating another document we’re basically saying: “change what was specified there for what is specified in here”…which, in this case, translates to rfc7432 implementations having to also be compliant with this document (for all cases).  As far as I can tell, the extensions defined in this document are specific to the DCI case and not general to any EVPN scenario.  If that is correct then we shouldn’t be formally Updating rfc7432.

Having said that, Sasha is correct in pointing out that there are several differences with respect to rfc7432.  That is properly captured in the text at the end of Section 2 (for the DCI scenario), without the need for the formal Update.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On February 20, 2018 at 5:40:59 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) (jorge.rabadan@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>) wrote:

1.       From my POV this draft should be marked as updating RFC 7432 in its metadata. The update should refer to several aspects including at least the following:

a.       Use of Ethernet PWs (see Figure 1 in the draft) as an Ethernet Segment. RFC 7432 defines Ethernet Segment as a set of Ethernet links that connect a customer sit to one or more PEs.

b.       Use of the Unknown MAC Route (UMR). RFC 7432 only says that a PE may flood unicast frames with unknown destination MAC to all other PEs but does not have to do that, with the decision being a matter of local policy;  it neither defines any mechanisms that advertise a specific PE and a specific Ethernet Segment attached to this PE as the “default next Hop” for all unknown destination MAC addresses, nor prevents usage of such mechanisms.
[JORGE] I marked it as updating RFC7432 and explained why in section 2.


___________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
___________________________________________________________________________