[RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06

IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com> Tue, 27 February 2018 09:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ice@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFFA1241FC; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:18:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CC8_aSl4WoWC; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:18:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49638124BE8; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:18:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1709; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1519723102; x=1520932702; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: cc:to:mime-version; bh=98fciRCPdTOOi6URerbn8j7aoKN3eUT4t6iZgUNC82w=; b=lR9XivKa1tpEF3nguK50x7emiv45DqQtO4UKWRwZK2w0PXxAiUtInNq2 wzeODrPnRqvF/QJgNSPUJWRh06QJyVUj3Bi3kLV1S5S8//hbV+nKsuRUf y2IHfDH4mchtsWoheIALhLF7qEjFZvkW5F7izYf8QIjAa3CWv148EPMmV k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C4AwCMIZVa/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYQ1cCgEg1CLFo03AgEBEgEBAQEBAQaBDSKBABuCMpQMCiOFD4MjFAECAQEBAQEBAmsohU1WLwYCJgJfhRcNEKs4gieEcoN+ghQBAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBAQEBH4EPh0KCLikMgkKCWn8LAoR+MIIyBYgiixeHFQmGUIofgWVOcIJ2iFqJd4RkgkUCBAsCGQGBLjUhgVFNIxVkAYIZCDWEHT84jSIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,400,1515456000"; d="scan'208";a="2264853"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2018 09:18:20 +0000
Received: from ams-iwijnand-88112.cisco.com (ams-iwijnand-88112.cisco.com [10.60.202.93]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1R9IKpl028517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:18:20 GMT
From: IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:18:19 +0100
Message-Id: <50FD5EF7-509E-4A17-8321-3580EC206612@cisco.com>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidr-slurm@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org
To: "<rtg-ads@ietf.org>" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/8YlOUR66oJT2RkbkzqlK5KMo-_s>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:18:24 -0000

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-06 
Reviewer: IJsbrand Wijnands 
Review Date: 27-02-2018 
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary: 

• This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be considered prior to publication.

Comments:

This document reads ok.

Minor issues:

It seems to me it would be useful to have a "Terminology and Definitions” section where the various acronyms are defined. That would help readers who are less familiar in this area (like myself) to parse the document.

Nits:

1. Introduction
+++++++++++++++

* What is a "putative TAs”? Its not declared anywhere.

* What is a “ROAs”? Should there be a RFC reference here?


2. RPKI RPs with SLURM
++++++++++++++++++++++

* What are “RPs”? Its not declared anywhere. 


3.3.  SLURM Target
++++++++++++++++++

* "A SLURM filer”, is that a filter or file?