[RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-idr-rpd-14

Himanshu Shah via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 31 January 2022 22:47 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Himanshu Shah via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-rpd.all@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <164366927637.30179.14501509855986883727@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Himanshu Shah <hshah@ciena.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:47:56 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/C8PSoiyHCCYApTLaBdsl4dW0Vp8>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-idr-rpd-14

Reviewer: Himanshu Shah
Review result: Ready

The document is written well.

I am glad it covers the the precedence of static routing policy  against the
signaled routing policy. It would be good if the example would use the explicit
address range to explain; (for example - 1.1.1.0 to 1.1.1.255),  in section
4.2.1.

I was asked to review version 14 and have not checked the delta between the
latest version 15.

[RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-idr-r… Himanshu Shah via Datatracker
Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-i… Huaimo Chen