IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] Routing directorate review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-13

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 11 September 2018 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D86130E03; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z2KSevK7MFVo; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1076D1292AD; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id j26-v6so12331543pfi.10; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=WkzNRsx0/FK7UpHpJv+T0YDaMsD977hbTXDqabCm3ds=; b=uXQVIMFnXPionbmzcDvHCel4ilvDCvezREqvzmMDJ5ZQErxXpzEPICX2L7qP8Er3e2 3RltKHAjN6ko+PafKOiZmFPXYlqiBNPYzuFbmWl/D5TnQKOoz8/p+kr1KhZiMDogBo7V 4+k4EPDmDBBuryypOVKw9VMdhax27CE3ZbcSQr7aJnTzqfwlvgdQMYeFC9Y8evTrlTOg WJagMKH6WSwNuIsPWXNV7uQbLmEaOfD8pMWcJUrJ4snMztpnj+lw9TXxoVa9N5b0eU2E 6GFL1Jl6ZD0yBxPe9B+UxwRzhQuWxzZmG6DCd0DtlSQF0qH4pa0HEQlLPQQJ+5ZrKA8n vaWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=WkzNRsx0/FK7UpHpJv+T0YDaMsD977hbTXDqabCm3ds=; b=uHwMkxr6KLNX7xXMpSpzeTyGsyvm02yROyR9JJui9tghfHi2RpRbGvvclXBy3Zkj/F /U/GliCbSnEJnRXCxPHn1n2esMzIW7tXjYEiHpx7IVItwDuLUA6Puc9jxPiLYWAjtSXe OKdnUGSAX9lnI6CdVPRSJRqODpEk6Iclg7Yj0GBwAOXZbfD5hE2g78BpYsuqSRC32Z0D gsN35/aNTwf5vieMTO0PlaahfkStWX1cO/p1lxD7kv/l0NUzUAsz9zAL/0ncE2j59Igq bTfmF1elza6qGzQqQPOQ9g9eSXv/YEnSt1cCRKA7Xd4Hp0nDIqGvd1cHSm3cvGRITJgR fqSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CZt91UjXqvBAgn9ObzQsPPBglWEBZGqEsgwfcPyO+U6OdjAuo9 6j7pb7a8Cv+VOltTIf3+40vBLPr1
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdY8YaPnTarRio2Alj40ZYat24uP+I6atGTuj62VNvZBeWHfa0NrOE1uVmRTnGLSGRP8y0Fjsg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:931b:: with SMTP id b27-v6mr5160987pge.143.1536676751598; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.31.79.252] ([96.72.181.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f87-v6sm50932489pfh.168.2018.09.11.07.39.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <17D52CE3-C68D-4435-87D9-00730EE2E546@gigix.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:39:09 -0700
Cc: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis.all@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4F8143BE-291E-4F63-8603-5FE36615DFF5@gmail.com>
References: <CY1PR0201MB143680B8D8B3602EED7441A384000@CY1PR0201MB1436.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <56A10EEF-3CF5-4325-A7CB-337D4F22E106@gmail.com> <17D52CE3-C68D-4435-87D9-00730EE2E546@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/EU2OdSSvUT-HhNn2ETBqsk0Xd_0>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Routing directorate review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-13
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:39:14 -0000

I will update the spec to say type 7 is not assigned.

Dino

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 2:23 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dino,
> 
> a quick point on the control message type 7.
> 
>> On 7 Sep 2018, at 20:41, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> sec5.1: What about code point 7?  Not assigned?  Reserved?
>> 
>> It is assigned to a non-working group draft. NAT-traversal has not gone through working group process so far.
> 
> This point has been raised as well by Alvaro.
> 
> My take is that officially type 7 is NOT assigned and the document should state so.
> Eventually, NAT-traversal will be published and type 7 will be officially assigned. 
> But until then, documents should mark it as unassigned.
> 
> Ciao
> 
> L.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email