[RTG-DIR]draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-05 early Rtgdir review
Sue Hares via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 09 December 2025 21:43 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.8.105] (unknown [4.156.85.76]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36469983384A; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 13:43:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sue Hares via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.54.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <176531663208.1192987.5150129383044617535@dt-datatracker-5bd94c585b-wk4l4>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 13:43:52 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: XVTCJL4VXPCV6HFVQ3BJVGB2UCASPVC6
X-Message-ID-Hash: XVTCJL4VXPCV6HFVQ3BJVGB2UCASPVC6
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rtg-dir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang.all@ietf.org, tvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: [RTG-DIR]draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-05 early Rtgdir review
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/UKHWi4MkM2sSL5OSSy7T2MN2WfM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rtg-dir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rtg-dir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rtg-dir-leave@ietf.org>
Document: draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang Title: YANG Data Model for Scheduled Attributes Reviewer: Sue Hares Review result: Ready This is a view as part of the RTGDIR review. Status: Ready Summary: This draft is clear, concise, and provides a set of Key Yang modules. I commend the authors of this document. It is clear of major issues, minor issues, and editorial NITs. I have one long-term question for purely personal interest: Can this model be encoded in CBOR encodings? Cheers, Susan
- [RTG-DIR]draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-05 early Rt… Sue Hares via Datatracker
- [RTG-DIR]Re: draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-05 earl… Yingzhen Qu
- [RTG-DIR]Re: draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-05 earl… Tony Li
- [RTG-DIR]Re: draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-05 earl… Michael Richardson
- [RTG-DIR]Re: draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-05 earl… Susan Hares