Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13

[Ines Robles <[e-mail]>]

Excellent!

Thank you very much

Cheers,

Ines.

2018-01-15 21:06 GMT+02:00 Kathleen Moriarty <
[e-mail]>:

> Hi Ines,
>
> We added the following reference into the working version per your comment:
>
> http://www.jjsylvia.com/bigdatacourse/wp-content/
> uploads/2016/04/p14-verble-1.pdf
>
> Thank you,
> Kathleen
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Ines  Robles
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > Hi Kathleen,
> >
> > Ok, thank you for the feedback.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Ines.
> >
> > 2018-01-04 20:13 GMT+02:00 Kathleen Moriarty
> > <[e-mail]>:
> >>
> >> Hello Ines,
> >>
> >> Thanks again for your review.  Edits have been made in our working
> >> version that we hope to post soon.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Kathleen Moriarty
> >> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >> > Ines,
> >> >
> >> > Thank you very much for your review!  We're working on the comments
> >> > received and the nits you found will be addressed and are much
> >> > appreciated.
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Kathleen
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Ines Robles
> >> > <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >> >> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> >> >> Review result: Ready
> >> >>
> >> >> RtgDir review: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13.txt
> >> >>
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this
> >> >> draft. The
> >> >> Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
> >> >> drafts as
> >> >> they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on
> >> >> special
> >> >> request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the
> >> >> Routing ADs.
> >> >> For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
> >> >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
> >> >>
> >> >> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs,
> >> >> it would
> >> >> be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last
> >> >> Call
> >> >> comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
> >> >> discussion or by
> >> >> updating the draft.
> >> >>
> >> >> Document: Effect of Pervasive Encryption on Operators -
> >> >> draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13 Reviewer: Ines Robles Review Date:
> >> >> 12-11-2017
> >> >> Intended status: Informational
> >> >>
> >> >> Summary:
> >> >> This document discusses current security and network management
> >> >> practices to
> >> >> help guide protocol development in support of manageable, secure
> >> >> networks.
> >> >>
> >> >> The draft is ready, few typos found.
> >> >>
> >> >> Comments:
> >> >>
> >> >> I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well
> written
> >> >> and
> >> >> clear to understand.
> >> >>
> >> >> Major Issues:
> >> >>
> >> >> No major issues found.
> >> >>
> >> >> Minor Issues:
> >> >>
> >> >> Section 2:
> >> >>
> >> >> "... Following the Snowden revelations,..." => It would be nice to
> add
> >> >> some
> >> >> references here
> >>
> >> Yes, the problem we have had so far is finding ones that aren't
> >> articles that may not be stable.  A quick search pulls up new ones
> >> like the following:
> >> http://fortune.com/2016/04/25/snowden-encryption-james-clapper/
> >>
> >> We'll have to try again to find an academic publication.
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Section 2.2.5:
> >> >> "DRM..."=> I would expand it to  Digital Rights Management (DRM)
> >>
> >> Added, thank you!
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Section 6:
> >> >>
> >> >> inlcudes=> includes
> >>
> >> Fixed, thanks.
> >> >>
> >> >> Section 6.1:
> >> >> "information For example" => period missing?
> >>
> >> Ack, thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> Section 6.2:
> >> >> "soltuions" -> solutions
> >> Fixed.
> >> >>
> >> >> Section 7.1 title:
> >> >> "Encypted" => Encrypted
> >> Fixed.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your review!
> >>
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Kathleen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Kathleen
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
>