[RTG-DIR]Re: draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-05 early Rtgdir review

[Susan Hares <[e-mail]>]

Yingzhen:

Example scenario:
A network’s configuration requires that certain interfaces power-off/power-on on a schedule

Case 1:
A network operator might want to track scheduled changes to network interfaces – using notif.
Both – that the changes are configured correctly, and that the actual status matches this change.
Why?
Because if an outage occurs by misconfiguration, the customer will want a refund for getting turned off.

2) Case 2
If the power-off, was to save money and it does not occur – the network will burn more power.
The network administration/planning will want to know why.

Tracking vast numbers of interfaces – could be best handled by notif with CBOR binary encoding.
You do not want to overload the network with tracking data in XML format.

This does not hold up this yang module, but it may be something to consider.

Sue

From: Yingzhen Qu <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2025 5:17 PM
To: Susan Hares <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang-05 early Rtgdir review

Hi Sue, Thanks for the review. I'm not familiar with CBOR encodings, but I will look into it. Do you have any use case or requirements for it? Thanks, Yingzhen  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌
External ([e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>)
  Report This Email<removed-link>

Hi Sue,

Thanks for the review.

I'm not familiar with CBOR encodings, but I will look into it. Do you have any use case or requirements for it?

Thanks,
Yingzhen

On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 1:43 PM Sue Hares via Datatracker <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Document: draft-ietf-tvr-schedule-yang
Title: YANG Data Model for Scheduled Attributes
Reviewer: Sue Hares
Review result: Ready

This is a view as part of the RTGDIR review.

Status: Ready
Summary: This draft is clear, concise, and provides a set of Key Yang modules.
I commend the authors of this document.

It is clear of major issues, minor issues, and editorial NITs.

I have one long-term question for purely personal interest:
Can this model be encoded in CBOR encodings?

Cheers, Susan