IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] [yang-doctors] Fwd: We start to see our first YANG version 1.1 modules

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Tue, 10 November 2015 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7CB1B3D39 for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:13:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IXHASH_X1=1.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pp5bkyz-cEaC for <rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0127.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC6A1B3D37 for <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) by BN3PR0501MB1444.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.318.15; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:13:23 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) with mapi id 15.01.0318.003; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:13:23 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [yang-doctors] Fwd: We start to see our first YANG version 1.1 modules
Thread-Index: AQHRGxrTfHgwm8+4jkO+JAKs4og7b56WOGUA
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:13:23 +0000
Message-ID: <7E0767DA-3B3C-4523-9EFC-955DCA2266E5@juniper.net>
References: <563EF65E.8040704@cisco.com> <563EF6FA.5080901@cisco.com> <CABCOCHQhBfk1B0zfNt4QmxEJzykb3L4rD841kf+P87RhnjbDwA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHQhBfk1B0zfNt4QmxEJzykb3L4rD841kf+P87RhnjbDwA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151008
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1444; 5:k/QqJR9/LDk9uZzY1ETtfqnqiyD4/MNfMsw/h4qbDKQW+3VlSq2/Pr51Whqc4VOkLqdN2D91AvyvrJH+bx+CUrkVwHm/01pR/PTd6WzMl5l8/50/qlIlf/z4QjOU9RaFYBGUmwGDMKUInRa0F3XTEA==; 24:oWw/aoD2NKpX026OzA/CJeBl49aQ4xWiFB5Lg0UWOqYJgXL7OkOSV39fd7rYxCCK6klkIh6cQw/Jnd3UVQmAWlY/iDiyiUHMa9Wd6DqqARs=; 20:B3jR23NKJ6KIhW1U0rBInTD2AhTRPWLMBuvmmjBE7qJXIzL++ypr5eVJqEHtf/wQr3nR5++mI6909eneE23lPA==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1444;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0501MB1444B1A99AF94352851B88BEA5140@BN3PR0501MB1444.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(520078)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1444; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1444;
x-forefront-prvs: 07562C22DA
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(24454002)(2473001)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(24433001)(76176999)(40100003)(99286002)(19617315012)(5002640100001)(92566002)(86362001)(106356001)(66066001)(106116001)(105586002)(19580405001)(54356999)(5001770100001)(19580395003)(83716003)(36756003)(101416001)(2900100001)(16236675004)(15975445007)(189998001)(4001350100001)(2950100001)(5008740100001)(11100500001)(5007970100001)(122556002)(4001150100001)(82746002)(10400500002)(5001960100002)(50986999)(83506001)(33656002)(102836002)(77096005)(97736004)(87936001)(5004730100002)(81156007)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1444; H:BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7E0767DA3B3C45239EFC955DCA2266E5junipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Nov 2015 19:13:23.1304 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1444
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-yang-coord/oDuObbYf-DGZGqbmIEpn5T5NgKA>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 06:41:55 -0800
Cc: YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] [yang-doctors] Fwd: We start to see our first YANG version 1.1 modules
X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" <rtg-yang-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-yang-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-yang-coord>, <mailto:rtg-yang-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:13:31 -0000

[Moving rtg-yang-coord to BCC]

Hi Andy,

5 out of 7 of the YANG modules listed below are from my server-model draft, for which the WG said I SHOULD use 1.1 (specifically the new if-feature and action statements).   The server-model draft has a normative reference onto 6020bis, so it’s okay, right?

Kent

From: yang-doctors <yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:yang-doctors-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com<mailto:andy@yumaworks.com>>
Date: Monday, November 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com<mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>>
Cc: "Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org<mailto:Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>" <rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org<mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Fwd: We start to see our first YANG version 1.1 modules

Hi,

YANG 1.1 has had only 2 comprehensive reviews.
Seems like the IETF should finish YANG 1.1 before using it.
Even though the version says 1.1 and the charter says bugfixes only,
there are many massive changes required to a server in order
to support YANG 1.1, so I strongly suggest people review the draft.


Andy


On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com<mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:
Dear all,

I will stop duplicating messages to the different YANG-related mailing lists.
I hope that you guys are part of yang-coord@ietf.org<mailto:yang-coord@ietf.org>, to which I post from time to time.

Regards, Benoit

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        We start to see our first YANG version 1.1 modules
Date:   Sun, 8 Nov 2015 08:14:38 +0100
From:   Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com><mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>
To:     yang-coord@ietf.org<mailto:yang-coord@ietf.org> <yang-coord@ietf.org><mailto:yang-coord@ietf.org>



Dear all,

We start to see our first version 1.1 YANG data modules, coming from:
    draft-entitydt-netmod-entity-00.txt
    draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-08.txt:
    draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-08.txt:
    draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang-01.txt:

The corresponding YANG modules are:
DEBUG: ietf-entity@2015-10-19.yang<mailto:ietf-entity@2015-10-19.yang> is version 1.1
DEBUG: ietf-netconf-server@2015-10-09.yang<mailto:ietf-netconf-server@2015-10-09.yang> is version 1.1
DEBUG: ietf-tls-server@2015-10-09.yang<mailto:ietf-tls-server@2015-10-09.yang> is version 1.1
DEBUG: ietf-ssh-server@2015-10-09.yang<mailto:ietf-ssh-server@2015-10-09.yang> is version 1.1
DEBUG: interfaces-common@2015-10-19.yang<mailto:interfaces-common@2015-10-19.yang> is version 1.1
DEBUG: ietf-keychain@2015-10-09.yang<mailto:ietf-keychain@2015-10-09.yang> is version 1.1
DEBUG: ietf-restconf-server@2015-10-09.yang<mailto:ietf-restconf-server@2015-10-09.yang> is version 1.1

Regards, Benoit





_______________________________________________
yang-doctors mailing list
yang-doctors@ietf.org<mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email