IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 21 December 2017 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA44E126CBF; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:35:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RPH6DaKzFzBw; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:35:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x229.google.com (mail-ot0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAB261243F3; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x229.google.com with SMTP id d27so23633447ote.11; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:35:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g8D8HR4bJKQVWnkXm0HGSmfBGEPCGme6q/YcbtDkgwM=; b=SUfhbYL55rwRa4ewndzsyrjFc7C1YPUFcXcZkxmTAYwNRM8lAWAgE6o/oF5kAS4ZaA ZuemyiI2O5f3mwVRLf1r6MVext2b+0/sJgYkttR5LNEXmyumPMgDu6ZxMnV/vcWt62fP EwxhPTXAcqcsKO4T7uVJ6tPeo6jdh7/HenZfAowXWMKvPMZXNV/41nH9oqrEl/hqwqG2 sQdDNOIjQjqkOk8q+4bP9tlHuBC3mwq6OwXfnTcWwIr5cqrJV3IFxOvR2zAqdKG1oe4D CeGii9j814YI9T+V6mlKbZ9Ve/l+UxsdkjY2UYv1RF88CnNMSKo0nwu9MrO0Fgqvi+2F V6VQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g8D8HR4bJKQVWnkXm0HGSmfBGEPCGme6q/YcbtDkgwM=; b=ojOsdKl4WcKBD2v9+NDbtEaU97Hdw7ZIv75eEW54DjMwquySRd0TPdAcc0u0WfwY68 t148QqOumrh+dIWzlxcT+UjxdVygDk+rMgeZArn44E5ykHPCD1COlvEMj0bIC5eWUANC YXe0zeoeX7dip9AuqsFIJDSXsJZwHn2NlvlYnYK6G4JwqAvrLGxk9D2mGpdFXL1r8pyZ zlyJ7y0FAMF9Ad3rNN2efLsYbpyxCpXL13VOWkNtzYbTwjkE8onkr+nfPIZ9ybI3q2mR QOs86XsIbbpV/7PxYCwz3ouPmElQ9Mvqer1pA9I5JAjUYGsECS66+Pw1CRE+r54RMQ1v Ka8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJO8WBvze3JVDDrNaXHEQYSFJMIfI3qRjLoTcJhM8ZySVoFfTPU WhPFsy9KBFDPfUIHFTXq9CswzQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBos+AEOBp8KOq5MNi0TV3fFTAYPSgDn2tzjndaI1QZWV1y8i2FLpygwCMZpfv0aa9zeGQCbgaw==
X-Received: by 10.157.66.35 with SMTP id q35mr8571100ote.33.1513892115223; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [100.65.101.83] ([206.16.17.196]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e2sm9254662oic.34.2017.12.21.13.35.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:35:14 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.29.0.171205
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:35:11 -0800
Subject: Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: 'rtgwg-chairs' <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Rtg-dt-yang-arch <rtg-dt-yang-arch-bounces@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <6DC96095-4FE9-4FA2-B3B1-7764ADE22A88@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model
References: <B08AEDA6-EE43-41D1-B829-CDCDC3C5BF5F@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B08AEDA6-EE43-41D1-B829-CDCDC3C5BF5F@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/QQ8jVu3YArVGyy0GKNpbnM2Okkw>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:35:18 -0000

Dear RTGWG,

The draft has passed WGLC, shepherd writeup is there and all the comments have been addressed, the draft will be submitted to IESG. 

Cheers,
Jeff and Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, October 23, 2017 at 14:17
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Cc: 'rtgwg-chairs' <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Rtg-dt-yang-arch <rtg-dt-yang-arch-bounces@ietf.org>
Subject: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model

    Dear RTGWG,
    
    The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model.
    
    The interdependencies related to draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount have been addressed.
    There was consensus that document is ready for the last call during the last IETF meeting 
    and the authors have addressed all the comments from Directorate QA review and YANGDOCTORS.
    Please indicate support or no-support by November 6, 2017.
    
    IPR:
    If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this 
    email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. 
    The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
    The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been 
    received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
    
    Thanks,
    Jeff & Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email