IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Sat, 01 December 2018 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4CC126CC7; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 08:38:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SNrpS5KFLPy3; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 08:38:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF451241F6; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 08:38:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id u18so6241871lff.10; Sat, 01 Dec 2018 08:38:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Y8C9C/WP6L1ylIY5Bvm4dhzjAlYrOchscRNp8Lmcr/Q=; b=mWdPrrncfG4q94f/yRLcwYhbXiDzlmlAG4cM5sd6ChJEqSniSIntGOKer5TXXUC883 NKhcDGwuUkGdN40gKc0sBbPVszQXz6j6nEIMDfCvjLKq9HNYJ7G7DjskDGViTh5GJJWN l4k+QXs6By9k3wKnYFWd7FdRbV4c/OAqYpBQxAyJhWjcMy/uYNDuapxfUSvi4/zlOO1j Tpda6mAi0OfSJL2BeZa3mAGy/2I0dXef9+mXY0aAIBBUTzJk4eKk8VluPPGWFra+/Md9 zFxmIzslfmLMOyiRLPAVm9qfDIe6XZyH5d2uutWIpA1x+kMzI5ZIHJVXlm+f6XmENerC Hutw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y8C9C/WP6L1ylIY5Bvm4dhzjAlYrOchscRNp8Lmcr/Q=; b=eRG58ofXoz/4mkli4vjw2zZZgwl4WkxwysnWZUM4zy42K50swSCIcXzpGCJpriAtUJ d0Qz0oG4bzUJ3DJQ2Hc0vmfv+2pRt21Pe1VE5H/+dhRKsuwnMqa+4fN8MF/UHePdFiiX X4onPmz1ztmj/6PSEf+t/RRWPPYO2tKV2nCKn0qzAKMFuEPADyxOcq03KjlR31Xc3tMs GC+69XBGKPfVPmPeUT+an8UrnKQHLl/EIwx8hbYqetlbrRoFS3BL+zz4gXbn+WW5X1XX v7Vcs0LE5dVfpPXPyE0uHVGyXZJVxmTuuRAZcrFV3YLQiDeoVUESwYIhXoUrayZrddpA 6sJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYOpVckXflqc5jnfQeBdK7lhKizbRWUZgVre3F1hhuz/xZuISBh NBxKF4CB2dRbBZQMIYtPrQ7aiAbSe4wS83oZp8M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VWOQMgWGM0T2x6yBomwbX2XuYCV0N48P67lDIRyZNO59Mjo06SRQguJBwnz/Y71A4YbmJyQXHrs3PHCgg0hwE=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:c650:: with SMTP id w77mr6099392lff.56.1543682295296; Sat, 01 Dec 2018 08:38:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5e6b8c2a-bbc0-4390-b8d8-358477757cf6@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <5e6b8c2a-bbc0-4390-b8d8-358477757cf6@Spark>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 08:38:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmU=hckXjH+E8XCT2E+Z0aw7a69Y1hTreA84Ch+ewmWrkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000db75f2057bf88ad5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/QxeLMxFjfL-VnmMpMuqfYh9xKDY>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 16:38:20 -0000

Dear Authors,
thank you for taking on this work. I have a question rather philosophical
than technical. The title of the draft suggests that the models are generic
though they are based on DSCP field of the IP header. Have you considered
extending models to include the Traffic Class field of MPLS Label element?
And if not, then clarify that the models are for networks with IP data
plane?

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 6:31 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear RTGWG,
>
> The authors have requested RTGWG to adopt draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model
> as the working group document.
> The draft has received support during IETF101 meeting, authors have
> addressed all the comments received.
>
> Please indicate support or no-support by December 15, 2018.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this
> email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
> The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will
> not
> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
> author and each individual that has contributed to the document..
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff & Chris
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email