Re: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with DISCUSS)

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 10 January 2018 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11C112DA06; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:02:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5_5fagpnfqxQ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:02:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com (mail-pg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68C2F127023; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:02:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t67so33063pgc.5; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:02:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xqf8F7qmqzTB3hO81prSEm3AY0E+oCw1jNa0nFQsJy8=; b=pTCTBYI2mkNWOqsEFWQ1b/tb3sW+3/hn648xX3pn22B0msjas5pZVxKB9DJLaOwQfH /k6SMW16qgZeb6bX7adVJrWOm8Uma5EuQ4H3pvy1a6sUK/afmpva6vz9xyCzXg8xJVPU CiygTPonTRmNNemJbkB3xlwfUXerukVLVNl6E2UmNQ5VdopRwEdfFnDZQAK2NBi2uHWp ekzWDUiZ2YTqot6cGSjzHO/f0H4r1LdXQoJCAFY77xT2LaYV3H4gkdGuMLXda7XSxvmT iqRJX/m7fHpqrwf/er9MT4VXxnPmA8em+6Ooo8up1xCvQ1n0Z53vg1ciSrrNNhfanxOp TWLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xqf8F7qmqzTB3hO81prSEm3AY0E+oCw1jNa0nFQsJy8=; b=mi8Ab5b+stNCQJgZnMgwwKkC6Se9sMAh64i/sBWCZAKIniYWKUsQhRL0rlttztEbp9 xrThYdNXgVFjQwh5IQaoe5oH1JuLMsiE45y3o3KXVAe48xCTfZEp9Y+wv1ZgAUcwoqri LY0efTd3QHYnD5LHRlT51AgAOcFczWfvJ7x8FiUjk2OBsflz/c9TM4ZPzeW4CzKCL2iz /HwLkTFMG6Rcy3AjUNZE3t+fl7U+5UY+qY1vcL9VJwh5Ko2rEhvqaLauCKOvdQDmjG8g uWcWWrw9Q8ljdVFbWvGcrDwP4Zv+w4K9gxt+IOYEaukV4GAy7zyGLSWx0bcYPXKX0AoI pi7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIoXoEB8+x8TFBrfvRZxYMhScvF7GEpQ7M6tER77zp5nb0rZ+kZ n6z4OgWA/1/dESWlFqMoq6jMTaaERndWgIJoHaU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovvGqx1ZzmuvT9ttf6dkAazp5Xx6qdgLysYTiLyh8qAG9+uMb3n8q1N/Jt5QySo6GIza4R/OnmnEmiYeFGAxkw=
X-Received: by 10.124.25.5 with SMTP id c5mr14646609plz.225.1515610937885; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:02:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.186.208 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:01:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0201MB08678472F8D500F62759122DF1110@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <151544709334.11241.1527788183221266410.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BN3PR0201MB08678472F8D500F62759122DF1110@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:01:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6AcD=U2PD9SMucL3Qfo1t1+hQg4eFhj3KNB_-TQ-FmFg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with DISCUSS)
To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "yingzhen.qu@huawei.com" <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/ev-B40WxzK7qqScSeZ_hfBeDJQI>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 19:02:21 -0000

Thank you, Xufeng!

I checked and cleared my discuss.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> wrote:
> Hi Kathleen,
>
> Thanks for the comment. We have updated the document with the new security template, and submitted a new version https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09. Please check if this is ok.
>
> Regards,
> - Xufeng
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 4:32 PM
>> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
>> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu
>> <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>; rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org; yingzhen.qu@huawei.com;
>> rtgwg@ietf.org
>> Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: (with
>> DISCUSS)
>>
>> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: Discuss
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
>> paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Hello, Thanks for your work on this draft.  Could you please update the Security
>> Considerations to use the current template?  I believe this is the current, but that
>> should be confirmed:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-10#page-52
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen