Re: Need presentation slot in RTGwg at IETF100

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 03 November 2017 05:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6886B13FC05 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 22:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y7CUUDhGuXZk for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 22:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22b.google.com (mail-pg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F0913FBFC for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 22:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id s75so1654846pgs.0 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 22:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=sWjNUDasp3wtkgCUkrb11L8qyxWwWcBu97zdF47PuH8=; b=WImbT7ffTtr/Tq1UzE/vnmnuOcZWN2UCei8tjsXH52rxfhzh9WLoY/5sNQrdn1GS2h s69fgY+/ltp+BypRr+fI3urlgHQBrNBOPoXDJ2sfzkyG9wykAvjG/2a/wsGAvLJh5ks2 wUMpVf4Y7mMEyfh2AfWnJAGO+p8faWcomUi25krI1JhHCHKWpf4G5oE9Bl+dxqfADrCP EwfNga3rxTPpAVuIaX+dQug69rDfq6MtnzUtYwfNxDOq2NwPCrBzrogOIXVcEl5Yinpt OWWJJMu/L0t5+zd6EJqq6uetHZ36PoYkn7/Q6/T3Cuf9RFTjG99+FfOlk2oBnohmx3tZ RgqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=sWjNUDasp3wtkgCUkrb11L8qyxWwWcBu97zdF47PuH8=; b=SHfFWdPC/AE402tV2lshe8JRgfFgYbGpiTgBblfe2AeoYFQClq6KHQDOH6Q9B+yHCX 3j9VEm+O1PQyqBuUrKEtINAwaktaBwdddnygJnSle6xnkd0XIJHOY/WnMQFl156hsVX/ EJAIlqKy3DOD7cdstF0pbI5BqEXXdm57yYpn2qobmuzZDoRvZlcUINnh/NwEvuzRlEpV n5QXLrgb1iUcjZDQqHcdrPNL7RIsP8LcihEiVFNhw+fpDqh1/NXgwC4GSeUrXBz+Ubkc DFHmRjKiUGxYUMPgAP3iRjZYH0yEiGUGPM0gOfytu5IEm5f8g+AT6k02tuKru3+pHpHn Jj+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVb+PcBQGRylz8FoOlcIJVyi4YwcWNVDk8cUMeDYR7/YynS9UvG 0ikQcY/x4rutWQk+cz1X/r3s5Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Shps1hYmWz/1U/VNxsCyz8QKk+i1CFzh2MteF1N1Pl/GzMzg/EfAPVZLJvr6h/V4WRPeJelQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.125.71 with SMTP id m7mr6152186pgn.62.1509688689690; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 22:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([76.126.247.72]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z8sm9144754pfl.135.2017.11.02.22.58.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Nov 2017 22:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 22:58:08 -0700
Subject: Re: Need presentation slot in RTGwg at IETF100
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, "chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com" <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, Andrew Malis <Andrew.Malis@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <0EDFE1BE-5CEC-4FD7-9363-58C1FC576C23@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Need presentation slot in RTGwg at IETF100
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66AFC9852@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66AFC9852@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3592508289_1488176413"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/wSwl82HP5ABAW_Idy0WkV2nY47A>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 05:58:12 -0000

Hi Linda,

 

Thanks, noted.

 

Cheers,

Jeff

 

From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>;
Date: Thursday, November 2, 2017 at 20:25
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>;, "chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com"; <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>;
Cc: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>;, Andrew Malis <Andrew.Malis@huawei.com>;
Subject: Need presentation slot in RTGwg at IETF100

 

Jeff and Chris, 

 

Can you give us 15 ~20 minutes time to present VPN Extension to Dynamic Cloud DC? 

Here are some of the reasons we propose the topic: 

We want to bring general awareness of problems and use cases that have been discussed by ONUG (Open Network User Group) community. I have been participating in ONUG (Open Network User Group) discussion for over a year. (p.s. SD-WAN was conceived in ONUG about 4 years ago). ONUG is enterprises (users) driven community, focusing on their highly desired use cases and problems they face in the digital transformation. Today, one of the hot topic in ONUG is about Enterprises wanting to move workloads to cloud.

We also summarize some of the gaps of the enterprises utilizing abundant Cloud DC (i.e. 3rd party DC that hosts workloads from different users) resources in the process of embracing digital transformation. 

Even though not all use cases and problems can be directly translated to IETF solvable problems, many of them are worthwhile to bring to IETF attention, especially from routing area. 

We tried to put together drafts to describe the problems and gaps for enterprises to connect their workloads in 3rd party cloud DC, but the drafts alone don’t have the original use cases (voted by enterprises participating in ONUG), or may not stimulate in-depth discussion.  

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dm-vpn-ext-to-cloud-dc-problem-statement-01.txt

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dm-vpn-ext-to-cloud-dc-gap-analysis-00.txt

 

Linda