IP Traffic Engineering

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 26 September 2019 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB1D1201E5 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0o0Tqtp2KXGC for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B95D12000F for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id w2so484508qkf.2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=beJfIRw6jiOn/q09+HoeQ3JZfO6jCaS1KXhb2gKvuYs=; b=OoeJyMWsNA27fcMHWTmI3NHg7eYsB/8qHh4uQErk9GYBMinqykt82aryiEi0zNXhVG sbHi9lme0bhGnGh7VQujk+Ea6hNnSvh7OB4JptaHqE6IXru7KSEhSBBwLsGHarba+Vk3 kaml0OOPdmUaiIsSxkxIhOLRTQNb7BYtCNmSgcu9lddR/Fq1nnDF83TL9kUK5KxGjZqH 29EEdAKtoA4gMRJ+5+WS2JdTOoS9AL5ok+IS77jbMzPrNjzAgh744ZypRr4L8kV0vAQs 0kFXMqCTAT/UansUS9pJbK5Yl6Uh+Jsih9jYSJ7XIjLw3Pl9ru9MauH61nvXPkb6KSAn HrNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=beJfIRw6jiOn/q09+HoeQ3JZfO6jCaS1KXhb2gKvuYs=; b=Wqh4Mj32S7Wc0PxC0AjQ7DzWCl5bjek+ufKJkM2CkaQtpYXdRLR4zgUPnYg9C5Olq8 Ya5dZ6usm+ZpTOtNp4wYUQKWiwSzujRKws6TsJ8tDTJg+YvIVIKyD9nR25tvhgHszeGP YBswlE8J43+UZvnFljoaqv/ylA2Y4o25ihiGUqwr4fWPL4wm3eslbwEprLM8nz7+fbW8 uHCQN+y+kMw723PGwiNvqYoU0jVFuCwbuzblkNalreP89f0zjAsWjO6oTgcWpGvuX5Qn vyF8jEzOKOR5PCLuLVKT8zWQ00K9aLARZON6bApfrrITezUoOwwMZxbikZokWZiVMRO7 3T1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWbe3NQYDPlMC7Uc/+f6CmeFGOPVwbdaz73dRr9a90z7WsGudfb 5d+2VoqJSeYnz8KlRVeIVrxRcGhXrA7Y9efqb71+NZbj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyP6cYqDqignNPZGrxYFauX97jCxUmYML3jMjiIk7nWaSlDgXLRn7FoaDL4pxtDVD4bm9OOHMAmAjKqDVJnJmc=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:8547:: with SMTP id h68mr1524426qkd.219.1569539213008; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 16:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156953754350.31990.16627132446644830194@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156953754350.31990.16627132446644830194@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 01:06:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEEn9uGH-qjapYw2guxnipcYE0u-3PH6wWPECiCQDhXiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: IP Traffic Engineering
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000040b81205937cd3e6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/ybM1fcg1-r8kVpSx-l41xyb64ew>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 23:06:56 -0000

Dear RTGWG,

I just submitted a document where I present new perspective on traffic
engineering for IP networks. As the scope of the new architecture and
deployment target does not fit any other working group I decided to submit
it to RTGWG.

Comments, opinions, contribution - very welcome !

Kind regards,
Robert.

- - -

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.


        Title           : IP Traffic Engineering Architecture with Network
Programming
        Author          : Robert Raszuk
        Filename        : draft-raszuk-rtgwg-ip-te-np-00.txt
        Pages           : 22
        Date            : 2019-09-26

Abstract:
   This document describes a control plane based IP Traffic Engineering
   Architecture where path information is kept in the control plane by
   selected nodes instead of being inserted into each packet on ingress
   of an administrative domain.  The described proposal is also fully
   compatible with the concept of network programming.

   It is positioned as a complimentary technique to native SRv6 and can
   be used when there are concerns with increased packet size due to
   depth of SID stack, possible concerns regarding exceeding MTU or more
   strict simplicity requirements typically seen in number of enterprise
   networks.  The proposed solution is applicable to both IPv4 or IPv6
   based networks.

   As an additional added value, detection of end to end path liveness
   as well as dynamic path selection based on real time path quality is
   integrated from day one in the design.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raszuk-rtgwg-ip-te-np/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raszuk-rtgwg-ip-te-np-00
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-raszuk-rtgwg-ip-te-np-00